Table 1 Simulated QTLs: chromosome, positions, parameter name, effect sizes in percentage explained phenotypic variance, percentage of informative full-sib families for the QTL (percentage of crosses with at least one heterozygous parent), the maximum amount of LD (R2) with any marker, and the number of participants who detected the QTL.
From: Comparison of analyses of the QTLMAS XIII common dataset. II: QTL analysis
Chrom | QTL pos | Parameter | Effect size QTL | %Inf. Families | MaxLD | Times found |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 42.45 | Asymptote | 29.3% | 40 | 0.96 | 4 |
2 | 4.55 | Asymptote | 7.1% | 68 | 0.57 | 4 |
2 | 88.64 | Asymptote | 3.7% | 64 | 0.73 | 2 |
3 | 89.94 | Asymptote | 4.1% | 58 | 0.38 | 4 |
4 | 69.97 | Asymptote | 3.3% | 78 | 0.80 | 4 |
5 | 77.19 | Asymptote | 2.5% | 82 | 0.16 | 1 |
1 | 54.25 | Infl. Point | 32.3% | 62 | 0.24 | 0 |
2 | 33.02 | Infl. Point | 3.5% | 48 | 0.89 | 0 |
3 | 6.86 | Infl. Point | 3.5% | 34 | 1.00 | 0 |
3 | 56.09 | Infl. Point | 3.8% | 70 | 0.26 | 0 |
4 | 36.52 | Infl. Point | 3.2% | 84 | 0.35 | 1 |
5 | 59.71 | Infl. Point | 3.7% | 80 | 0.55 | 0 |
1 | 87.65 | Scaling factor | 23.4% | 50 | 0.95 | 2 |
2 | 48.89 | Scaling factor | 4.8% | 64 | 0.99 | 2 |
3 | 26.22 | Scaling factor | 4.7% | 80 | 0.44 | 3 |
4 | 9.62 | Scaling factor | 5.9% | 34 | 0.54 | 3 |
4 | 86.39 | Scaling factor | 6.6% | 74 | 0.80 | 2 |
5 | 31.48 | Scaling factor | 4.6% | 68 | 0.21 | 1 |