Skip to main content

Table 2 Numbers of reported and correctly identified QTLs.

From: Comparison of analyses of the QTLMAS XIII common dataset. II: QTL analysis

Participant

# Reported

# Correct

# Asymptote

# Inflection point

# Scaling factor

Demeure et al. [12]

9

4 (8)

4

0

0

Hadjipavlou et al. [13]

15

8 (13)

4

1

3

Heuven & Janss [10]

9

8 (9)

4

0

4

Veerkamp et al. [11]

14

9 (14)

5

0

4

Yazdi et al.

6

4 (5)

2

0

2

  1. Numbers between parentheses indicate the numbers if reported QTLs were within 10 cM (instead of 5 cM) of a simulated QTL and if more than one reported QTL within that interval are all considered correct.