Skip to main content
Download PDF

Volume 5 Supplement 4

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Animal Genomics for Animal Health (AGAH 2010)

In silico analysis of candidate genes associated with humoral innate immune response in chicken

BMC Proceedings volume 5, Article number: S36 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Production and function of natural antibodies (NAbs) constitutes an important mechanism of the humoral innate immunity in vertebrates. The level of NAbs in chicken is heritable and the genetic background has been partly investigated. However, to date the genetic determination of humoral innate immune response in avian species has not been fully described. The goal of this study was to propose a new set of candidate genes with a potential effect on the NAb phenotype for further SNP association study.

Methods

In silico analysis of positional and functional candidate genes covered 14 QTL regions associated with LPS, LTA & KLH NAbs and located on six chromosomes: GGA5, GGA6, GGA9, GGA14, GGA18 and GGAZ. The function of the genes was subsequently determined based on the NCBI, KEGG, Gene Ontology and InnateDB databases.

Results

As a result, the core panel of 38 genes participating in metabolic pathways of innate immune response was proposed. Most of them were assigned to chromosomes: GGA14, GGA5, GGA6 and GGAZ (13, 9, 8 and 5 genes, respectively). These candidate genes encode proteins predicted to play a role in (i) proliferation, differentiation and function of B lymphocytes; (ii) TLR signalling pathway, and (iii) MAP signalling cascade.

Conclusions

Proposed set of candidate genes is recommended to be included in the follow-up studies to model genetic networks of innate humoral immune response in chicken.

Background

Humoral innate immunity in vertebrates that establishes the first barrier against pathogens consists of two basic mechanisms – natural antibodies (NAbs) and complement system. Expanding the knowledge on this field of avian immunology might be of help to overcome the difficulties in poultry industry, struggling constantly with diseases outbreaks eg. Avian Influenza [1]. In chicken, the level of NAbs proved to be heritable [2]. However, the genetic determination of NAbs is not fully described as it lacks information on which genes can be considered as the regulators in the complicated network of NAbs creation and function. This study contributes to the discovery of genetic determination of humoral innate immunity as it lists the proposed positional and functional candidate genes that have the putative impact on the NAb phenotype.

Methods

Chromosomal regions for in silico candidate gene analysis were initially selected based on the location of the QTL associated with the NAb titres directed against LPS (lipopolysaccharide), LTA (lipoteichoic acid) and KLH (keyhole limpet hemocyanine) antigens in chicken. This step was performed based on results from two independent studies, i.e.

● Study 1 – LPS and LTA NAb QTL detection study [3];

● Study 2 – LPS and LTA NAb QTL validation study; KLH NAb detection study (data not published).

Study 2 was carried out within a new chicken reference population, set-up as a F2 cross between commercially selected breed (WL, White Leghorn) and a Polish, unselected native chicken breed (GP, Green-legged Partridgelike). For a candidate gene analysis reported here, the chromosomal regions of interest included QTL associated with LPS and LTA NAb titres that had been detected in study 1 and consecutively validated in study 2 as well as QTL associated with KLH NAb titres that had been detected in study 2. These QTL were located in the following chicken chromosomes: GGA5, GGA6, GGA9, GGA14, GGA18 and GGAZ. The regions of interest were designated based on the physical location of the microsatellite markers flanking the QTLs. The list of candidate genes within the QTL regions was prepared based on NCBI database [4], and gene function was assessed with KEGG [5], InnateDB [6] and Gene Ontology [7]. The genes meeting both the criteria, i.e. location within the QTL regions & function in innate immunity (including signalling pathways and B cell function) were listed in a panel of the candidate genes associated with humoral innate immune response.

Results

The results of the candidate gene analysis are presented in Table 1. Briefly, based on previously described criteria, the total number of 38 candidate genes located on six chromosomes was selected. The highest number of the candidate genes (13 genes) was located on GGA14; 9 genes were found on GGA5 and 8 – on GGA6. Lower number of candidate genes were found on GGAZ (5 genes), on GGA18 (2 genes) and on the GGA9 (1 gene).

Table 1 Positional and functional candidate genes associated with innate humoral immune response
Full size table

It can be summarized that these candidate genes encode proteins predicted to play a role in:

(i) Proliferation, differentiation and function of B lymphocytes, e.g. CXCL12, BLNK, IL21R, RBP4, CD59, TNFRSF13B;

(ii) TLR signalling pathway, e.g. TRAF6, FADD, NFκBIA, CARD11, FAS, FGF8, TGFB, IL31RA;

(iii) MAP signalling cascade, e.g. MAP2K3, MAP2K4, MAP3K1, MAP3K13, MAPK8IP3.

Discussion

Immune response is a complicated process; encoded by multiple genes organized within the frames of functional networks rather than pathways and regulated by many interactions. However, prior to modelling the most probable genetic network, the information is needed on the genes that can be taken into account and their physiological function.

As mentioned above, the function of the proposed set of candidate genes was associated with three groups of cellular and physiological processes that can hypothetically affect innate humoral immune response in chicken. Briefly, production of antibodies, including NAbs takes place in B cells, stimulated by Th2 cytokines. Therefore, both B and T cells function is a crucial element in antibody release. CXCL12 gene is responsible for B cells proliferation [8]. CXCL12-/- knockout mice produced drastically reduced number of B cells and died during the perinatal period [9]. In turn, BLNK gene affects B cell development, which was completely inhibited in BLNK-/- knockout mouse [10]. Finally, IL21R and RBP4 genes are responsible for maintenance of mature B cells function. Knocked out mice (both IL21R-/- and RBP4-/-) expressed impaired production of antibodies [11, 12].

TLR signalling pathway is triggered when molecular patterns (such as LPS or LTA) are recognized. Some of the proposed candidate genes are involved in TLR pathway, just to mention TRAF6 and FADD, as well as genes affecting NFκB expression and function, such as NFκBIA, CARD11, TNFRSF13B and FAS[13–15]. Furthermore, the analysis in silico pointed out a number of genes that activate MAPK cascade, a key signalling pathway initiated by TLR, for example FGF8, TGFB3 and IL31RA[14]. Additionally, the candidate gene set includes such genes as MAP2K3, MAPK8IP3, MAP3K13, MAP2K4 and MAP3K1, which are the members of MAPK signal transduction pathway [15].

Conclusions

Chicken immune response is one of the major areas recently studied in life science research related to livestock. So far, different approaches have been applied to dissect the genetic bases of avian health traits. Rapid development of technology supporting high-throughput genomic studies provided an excellent tool for fast and efficient genotyping. Still, the accurate gene selection can pose a problem. Therefore, the additional criteria, like validated QTL regions may be of assistance to list the proper genes that can be further on evaluated and contribute to genetic network modelling of humoral immune response in chicken. For that reason we proposed a panel of candidate genes related to the level of LPS, LTA & KLH NAbs in chicken.

References

  1. Gauthier-Clerc M, Lebarbenchon C, Thomas F: Recent expansion of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1: a critical review. Int. J. Avian Sci. 2007, 149: 201-214.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parmentier HK, Lammers A, Hoekman JJ, de V Reilingh G, Zaanen ITA, Savelkoul HFJ: Different levels of natural antibodies in chickens divergently selected for specific antibody responses. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2004, 28: 39-49. 10.1016/S0145-305X(03)00087-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siwek M, Buitenhuis B, Cornelissen S, Nieuwland M, Knol EF, Crooijmans R, Groenen M, Parmentier H, van der Poel J: Detection of QTL for innate: non-specific antibody levels binding LPS and LTA in two independent populations of laying hens. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2006, 30: 659-66. 10.1016/j.dci.2005.09.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Center for Biotechnology Information: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

  5. Kanehisa M, Goto S: KEGG: kyoto encyklopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 27-30. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lynn DJ, Winsor GL, Chan C, Richard N, Laird MR, Barsky A, Gardy JL, Roche FM, Chan THW, Shah N, Lo R, Naseer M, Que J, Yau M, Acab M, Tulpan D, Whiteside MD, Chikatamarla A, Mah B, Munzner T, Hokamp K, Hancock REW, Brinkman FSL: InnateDB: facilitating systems-level analyses of the mammalian innate immune response. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4: 218-10.1038/msb.2008.55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gene Ontology Consortium: Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Res. 2001, 11: 1425-33. 10.1101/gr.180801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma Q, Jones D, Borghesani PR, Segal RA, Nagasawa T, Kishimoto T, Bronson RT, Springer TA: Impaired B-lyphopoiesis, myelopoiesis, and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice. PNAS. 1998, 95: 9448-53. 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9448.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagasawa T, Hirota S, Tachibana K, Takakura N, Nishikawa S, Kitamura Y, Yoshida N, Kikutani H, Kishimoto T: Defects of B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone-marrow myelopoiesis in mice lacking the CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1. Nature. 1996, 382: 635-8. 10.1038/382635a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pappu R, Cheng AM, Li B, Gong Q, Chiu C, Griffin N, White M, Sleckman BP, Chan AC: Requirement for B Cell Linker Protein (BLNK) in B Cell Development. Science. 1999, 286: 1949-54. 10.1126/science.286.5446.1949.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Quadro L, Gamble MV, Vogel S, Lima AAM, Piantedosi R, Moore SR, Colantuoni V, Gottesman ME, Guerrant RL, Blaner WS: Retinol and Retinol-Binding Protein. Gut Integrity and Circulating Immunoglobulins. J Infect Dis. 2000, 182 Suppl 1: S97-S102. 10.1086/315920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozaki K, Spolski R, Feng CG, Qi CF, Cheng J, Sher A, Morse HC, Liu C, Schwartzberg PL, Leonard WJ: A critical role for IL-21 in regulating immunoglobulin production. Science. 2002, 298: 1630-4. 10.1126/science.1077002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li X, Stark GR: NFκB-dependent signaling pathway. Exp. Hematol. 2002, 30: 285-96. 10.1016/S0301-472X(02)00777-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cormican P, Lloyd AT, Downing T, Connell SJ, Bradley D, O'Farrelly C: The avian Toll-Like receptor pathway--subtle differences amidst general conformity. Dev Comp Immunol. 2009, 33: 967-73. 10.1016/j.dci.2009.04.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lynn DJ, Lloyd AT, O'Farrelly C: In silico identification of components of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway in clustered chicken expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2003, 93: 177-84. 10.1016/S0165-2427(03)00058-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Massagué J: Integration of Smad and MAPK pathways: a link and a linker revisited. Genes Dev. 2003, 17: 2993-7. 10.1101/gad.1167003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Shepherd EG, Nelin LD: MAPK phosphatases-regulating the immune response. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 7: 202-12. 10.1038/nri2035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study supported by the State Committee for Scientific Research (grant no. P 06D 012 30) and by the Integrated Regional Development Programme (grant no. SPS.IV-3040-UE/S05/2009)

This article has been published as part of BMC Proceedings Volume 5 Supplement 4, 2011: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Animal Genomics for Animal Health (AGAH 2010). The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5?issue=S4.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Biotechnology, University of Technology and Life Sciences, Bydgoszcz, 85-084, Poland

    Anna Slawinska, Marek Bednarczyk & Maria Siwek

  2. Department of Biological Bases of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences, Lublin, 20-950, Poland

    Andrzej Witkowski

Authors
  1. Anna Slawinska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrzej Witkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marek Bednarczyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria Siwek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Slawinska.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AS performed the analysis and drafted the manuscript; AW made substantial contributions to acquisition of data; MB participated in the design of the study; MS conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slawinska, A., Witkowski, A., Bednarczyk, M. et al. In silico analysis of candidate genes associated with humoral innate immune response in chicken. BMC Proc 5 (Suppl 4), S36 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S4-S36

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S4-S36

Keywords

BMC Proceedings

ISSN: 1753-6561

Contact us