Volume 5 Supplement 6
The concordance of European and US definitions for healthcare-associated infections (HAI)
© Hansen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Published: 29 June 2011
Introduction / objectives
In Europe comparison of infection rates of HAI is restricted since some countries are using CDC definitions while others use HELICS (Hospitals in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance) definitions. As part of the harmonization process of surveillance, ECDC outsourced a study to analyze the concordance between the definitions.
A group with experts from 7 European countries was set up to realize the study. Agreement for bloodstream infection (BSI) and pneumonia (PN) was estimated by Cohens kappa.
The study was performed on 47 ICUs and 6506 patients, 180 PN and 123 BSI cases. Agreement for PN was k= 0.99 (CI95 0.98;1.00). When PN cases were divided in clinically and microbiologically defined PN, kappa values were 0.90 (CI95 0.86;0.94) and 0.72 (CI95 0.63;0.82) respectively. Diagnosis of PN varied among countries: 4 countries predominantly surveyed microbiologically defined PN whereas the others recorded mainly clinically defined PN. Agreement for BSI was k= 0.73 (CI95 0.66;0.80), BSI cases secondary to another infection site (42% of all BSI) were missed by CDC definitions. BSI concordance was perfect (k= 1.00) when only primary BSI cases (HELICS BSI with origin “catheter” or “unknown” and CDC BSI) were analyzed.
Although other methodological differences exist between the two protocols, case definitions per se do not compromise comparability of results and should not be an obstacle for harmonization of European surveillance.
Disclosure of interest
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.