Volume 5 Supplement 7

IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference 2011: From Genomes to Integration and Delivery

Open Access

Expression pattern of the GRAS gene family during somatic embryogenesis in pine

  • Inmaculada Hernández1Email author,
  • Elena Carneros1,
  • Alberto Pizarro1,
  • Dolores Abarca2 and
  • Carmen Díaz-Sala2
BMC Proceedings20115(Suppl 7):P136

DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P136

Published: 13 September 2011

The GRAS protein family of putative transcription factors, which includes SHORT-ROOT (SHR), SCARECROW (SCR) and SCARECROW-LIKE (SCL) proteins, is involved in root development in Arabidopsis thaliana and other plant species [1]. In forest species, genes with homology to the A. thaliana SCR gene have been involved in the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Picea glauca (Moench) Voss [2] and Pinus taeda L. [3] as well as in the development of radial patterning of roots in Pinus sylvestris L. [4]. Schrader et al [5] also reported the expression of genes with homology to the A. thaliana SHR gene in cambial region of Populus tremula x tremuloides. Increased levels of mRNA of Pinus radiata SHR (PrSHR), Pinus radiata SCARECROW-LIKE1 (PrSCL1) and Castanea sativa SCARECROW-LIKE1 (CsSCL1) have been associated with the early stages of adventitious root induction in Pinus radiata D. Don and Castanea sativa Mill., respectively [69].

In addition to PrSHR and PrSCL1, we have identified 13 new GRAS genes belonging to the different GRAS clades in the pine genome. The objective of this work is the analysis of the spatiotemporal expression patterns of the pine GRAS gene family during somatic embryogenesis in Pinus radiata D. Don. Somatic embryogenesis has become the first biotechnology showing great potential for mass propagation of conifers for application in forestry, allowing the implementation of multivarietal forestry (MVF) [10, 11]. Despite major advances in clonal regeneration by somatic embryogenesis or organogenesis, many forestry species are recalcitrant [12]. More knowledge of the regeneration process regulation is necessary to improve the capacity of vegetative regeneration.

The expression pattern of the genes was analyzed by qRT-PCR following the methodology described by Sánchez et al [6] and Solé et al [7]. For expression analysis, total RNA was extracted from four stages of the somatic embryogenic process: proliferative tissue after 7 and 14 days from the last transference to proliferation medium, somatic embryos at the beginning of differentiation and cotyledonary somatic embryos.

In general, the transcripts of the pine GRAS genes accumulated at the highest levels in cotyledonary somatic embryos. In addition, the transcript levels of PrSCR, PrSHR, PrSCL1, PrSCL6, PrSCL8, PrSCL11 andPrSCL12 showed an increase in somatic embryos at the beginning of differentiation. No differences in PrSCL10 transcript levels were found between the four stages analyzed. Transcript levels of PrSCL16 were undetectable at all stages. In situ hybridization for spatial expression analysis will confirm differential expression domains.

This work has been funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (AGL-2008-05105-C02-01/FOR).

Embryogenic lines were provided by C. Walter (Scion).

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Plant Biology, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares
Department of Plant Biology, Universtiy of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares


  1. Bolle C: The role of GRAS proteins in plant signal transduction and development. Planta. 2004, 218: 683-692. 10.1007/s00425-004-1203-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stasolla C, van Zyl L, Egertsdotter U, Craig D, Liu W, Sederoff RR: The effects of polyethylene glycol on gene expression of developing white spruce somatic embryos. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131: 49-60. 10.1104/pp.015214.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cairney J, Zheng L, Cowels A, Hsiao J, Zismann V, et al: Expressed sequence tags from loblolly pine embryos reveal similarities with angiosperm embryogenesis. Plant Mol Biol. 2006, 62: 485-501. 10.1007/s11103-006-9035-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Laajanen K, Vuorinen I, Salo V, Juuti J, Raudaskoski M: Cloning of Pinus sylvestris SCARECROW gene and its expression pattern in the pine root system, mycorrhiza and NPA-treated short roots. New Phytol. 2007, 175: 230-243. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02102.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schrader J, Nilsson J, Mellerowicz E, Berglund A, Nilsson P, Hertzberg M, Sandberg G: A high-resolution transcript profile across the wood-forming meristem of poplar identifies potential regulators of cambial stem cell identity. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 2278-2292. 10.1105/tpc.104.024190.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sánchez C, Vielba JM, Ferro E, Covelo G, Solé A, Abarca D, de Mier BS, Díaz-Sala C: Two SCARECROW-LIKE genes are induced in response to exogenous auxin in rooting-competent cuttings of distantly related forest species. Tree Physiol. 2007, 27: 1459-1470.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Solé A, Sánchez C, Vielba JM, Valladares S, Abarca D, Díaz-Sala C: Characterization and expression of a Pinus radiata putative ortholog to the Arabidopsis SHORT-ROOT gene. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28: 1629-1639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Abarca D, Díaz-Sala C: Adventitious root formation in conifers. Adventitious Root Formation of Forest Trees and Horticultural Plants- From Genes to Applications. Edited by: Niemi K & Scagel C. 2009, Kerala, India: Research Signpost, 227-257.Google Scholar
  9. Abarca D, Díaz-Sala C: Reprogramming adult cells during organ regeneration in forest species. Plant Signal Behav. 2009, 4: 8793-795.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Park YS: Implementation of conifer somatic embryogenesis in clonal forestry: technical requirements and deployment considerations. Ann For Sci. 2002, 59: 651-656. 10.1051/forest:2002051.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Klimaszewska K, Trontin J-F, Becwar MR, Devillard C, Park Y-S, Lelu-Walter M-A: Recent progress in somatic embryogenesis of four Pinus spp. Tree For Sci Biotech. 2007, 1: 11-25.Google Scholar
  12. Bonga JM, Klimaszewska K, von Aderkas P: Recalcitrance in clonal propagation, in particular of conifers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010, 100: 241-254. 10.1007/s11240-009-9647-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Hernández et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.