Volume 5 Supplement 7

IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference 2011: From Genomes to Integration and Delivery

Open Access

Effect of PGR pulse treatments and ethylene precursor and inhibitors on Scots pine micropropagation

BMC Proceedings20115(Suppl 7):P150

DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P150

Published: 13 September 2011

Background

Conifer clonal forestry as a form of plantation forestry has great potential advantages. However, vegetative propagation of conifers, especially that of mature trees, is quite problematic. These species also are most recalcitrant objects for cultivation in vitro. For this reason the development of an effective system for clonal micropropagation of some conifers is still an important aim. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) is one of the most widespread conifers in the world and in Russia. This important species has high economic value. Among Pinus species, Scots pine is especially difficult to deal with in culture [1]. We investigated influence of pulse treatment with BA, GA and auxins on clonal micropropagation of Scots pine. In addition effects of ethylene precursor and inhibitors were analyzed.

Methods

Seeds were collected in 2008 from open pollinated trees growing in the Republic of Belarus (Gomel Region) and were stored at 4-5 °C until used. Seeds were washed under running tap water for 24 h, surface-sterilized in 15% H2O2 for 30 min, rinsed in sterile water and germinated on wet filter paper in plastic containers. The germinating seeds were incubated for 10-11 days at 23±1 °C in the dark. Hypocotyls of the seedlings were trimmed to 5-7 mm upper cotyledons, sterilized in 0.2% Hg(NO3)2 for 4 min, rinsed in sterile water and placed vertically on hormone-free medium PM1 [2], containing 3% sucrose, 0.25% Gelrite gellan gum (Sigma, USA). After one week (BA treatment) or 6-7 weeks (auxin treatment) explants were used for experiments. For shoot induction explants were treated in an aqueous 50 or 100 mg/l BA solution buffered with 0.1 M MES during 0.5, 1.5 or 4 h. For elongation newly formed shoots were treated in 0.2, 1 or 5 mg/l GA3 during 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 h. For rooting pulse treatment by 50 or 100 mg/l NAA and IBA for 6 or 24 h were used. After treatments explants were transplanted on hormone-free medium: MS and PM1 (BA treatment), PM1 (GA treatment), 1/2 DCR (auxin treatment). Effects of various ethylene inhibitors, including AgNO3 (10 and 40 μM) and CoCl2 (10 and 100 μM), and the ethylene precursor ethephon (3 and 10 mg/l) also were studied in our experiments. Culture conditions were 23±1 °C and a photoperiod of 16 h. Rooted shoots were transferred to a peat-perlite (3:1) mixture and acclimatized in a greenhouse under gradually decreasing humidity conditions during 3-4 weeks.

Results and conclusions

The best results after BA pulse treatment were obtained at 4 h exposure to 100 mg/l solution (Table 1). Using this time, about 74.2% of explants formed an average of 3.5 buds. The proportion of vitrified explants was higher on MS medium (up to 76%) than on PM1 medium (up to 33%). It is interesting that we observed shoot regeneration on tips of cotyledons.
Table 1

Effect of BA pulse treatment on shoot formation in Scots pine.

Treatment, mg/l - hours

Medium

Vitrification, %

Necrosis, %

Explants with shoots, %

Shoots/explant

0-1.5

PM1

33.3

16.7

0.0

-

 

MS

63.6

50.0

0.0

-

50-0.5

PM1

20.5

12.2

75.6

3.1

 

MS

75.5

15.5

71.4

3.1

50-1.5

PM1

12.8

2.1

53.2

2.6

 

MS

73.5

11.0

40.8

2.8

50-4

PM1

5.7

3.6

62.3

3.0

 

MS

50.0

12.5

69.0

2.4

100-0.5

PM1

27.8

3.6

64.8

3.2

 

MS

44.6

6.7

60.7

2.9

100-1.5

PM1

6.3

11.1

56.3

2.8

 

MS

45.2

13.9

54.8

2.6

100-4

PM1

3.2

8.8

74.2

3.5

 

MS

23.8

12.5

50.0

1.7

The previous studies showed that optimal treatment duration and the concentration of cytokinin are different for each conifer species. For instance, for explants of P.canariensis the best exposure time was 4-8 h in 22.5 mg/l BA solution [3]. High concentrations or prolonged exposure can completely suppress shoot formation. Bud induction in P. wallichiana was not observed at concentrations above 135 mg/l BA and time more than 3 h [4].

Pulse treatment with 0.2, 1 or 5 mg/l GA solution did not improve shoot elongation. Addition of AgNO3 to medium decreased vitrification and death of explants in comparisons with CoCl2 and ethephon. The treatment with 50 mg/l NAA during 6 h resulted in 44% rooted shoots after 12 weeks of culture, whereas pulse treatments with IBA resulted in 13-19% root formation (Table 2). An average of 1.5-3.2 roots per shoot were produced after NAA treatment and only single root per shoot after IBA treatment.
Table 2

Effect of auxin pulse treatment on root formation in Scots pine.

Auxin

Treatment, mg/l-hours

Rooting, %

Root/shoot

Root length, mm

control

water-24

3.1

1.0

2.0

NAA

50-6

43.8

1.5

16.5

 

50-24

34.4

1.8

17.5

 

100-6

37.5

3.2

14.9

 

100-24

21.9

2.6

15.8

IBA

50-6

15.6

1.0

40.8

 

50-24

12.5

1.0

21.5

 

100-6

18.8

1.0

14.2

 

100-24

12.5

1.0

12.0

Similar results were obtained when auxin pulse treatment was applied on other Pinus species. When shoots of P.ayacahuite were incubated in 18.6 mg/l NAA for 8 h, up to 40% of the shoots were rooted [5]. An exposure of 6 h to 203 mg/l IBA solution resulted in 27.4% rooted shoots of P. wallichiana[4]. Rooted plants of Scots pine were successfully acclimatized in the greenhouse with the survival rate 80-90% (Figure 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1753-6561-5-S7-P150/MediaObjects/12919_2011_Article_868_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Acclimatized plants of Scots pine in the greenhouse.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Branch of Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry RAS

References

  1. Hohtola A: Seasonal changes in explant viability and contamination of tissue cultures from mature Scots pine. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1988, 15: 211-222. 10.1007/BF00033645.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Schestibratov K, Mikhailov R, Dolgov S: Plantlet regeneration from subculturable nodular callus of Pinus radiate. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003, 72: 139-146. 10.1023/A:1022296028951.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Pulido C, Harry I, Thorpe T: Optimization of bud induction in cotyledonary explants of Pinus canariensis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1992, 29: 247-255. 10.1007/BF00034360.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mathur G, Nadgauda R: In vitro plantlet regeneration from mature zygotic embryos of Pinus wallichiana A.B. Jacks. Plant Cell Rep. 1999, 19: 74-80. 10.1007/s002990050713.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Saborio F, Dvorak W, Donahue J, Thorpe T: In vitroregeneration of plantlets from mature embryos of Pinus ayacahuite. Tree Physiol. 1997, 17: 787-796.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lebedev and Shestibratov; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement