Skip to main content

Table 3 Power comparisons of FBAT-v with different weighting schemes for SBP/DBP

From: Testing rare variants for hypertension using family-based tests with different weighting schemes

Gene

Power of Tests

FBAT-v-e

FBAT-v-e-grv

FBAT-v-e-lor

FBAT-v-e-ow

FBAT-v-e-fp

Significance level = 0.05

 

MAP4

0.63/0.505

0.65/0.53

0.51/0.47

0.68/0.56

0.65/0.52

TNN

0.015/0.03

0.01/0.03

0.02/0.01

0/0.02

0.06/0.04

NRF1

0/0.025

0/0.01

0.01/0

0.03/0.02

0.05/0.03

LEPR

0.035/0.04

0.04/0.01

0.03/0.01

0.05/0.03

0.04/0.035

FLT3

0/0.025

0.02/0.04

0/0.01

0.04/0.05

0/0.03

Significance level = 0.1

 

MAP4

0.82/0.715

0.86/0.74

0.71/0.62

0.85/0.765

0.83/0.74

TNN

0.075/0.085

0.08/0.1

0.09/0.115

0.1/0.16

0.22/0.19

NRF1

0.035/0.1

0.03/0.125

0.02/0.09

0.06/0.185

0.08/0.145

LEPR

0.07/0.105

0.05/0.09

0.08/0.135

0.11/0.2

0.1/0.12

FLT3

0.035/0.1

0.05/0.13

0.04/0.11

0.055/0.15

0.04/0.13

Significance level = 0.2

 

MAP4

0.90/0.865

0.92/0.87

0.85/0.77

0.95/0.89

0.94/0.85

TNN

0.17/0.2

0.15/0.22

0.18/0.21

0.15/0.255

0.29/0.33

NRF1

0.155/0.195

0.18/0.21

0.14/0.18

0.2/0.24

0.17/0.22

LEPR

0.07/0.165

0.08/0.175

0.09/0.19

0.14/0.22

0.11/0.17

FLT3

0.135/0.195

0.15/0.18

0.17/0.22

0.195/0.17

0.15/0.215

  1. FBAT-v-e FBAT-v with weighted sum weights as in De et al. [11] using empirical variance, FBAT-v-e-fp FBAT-v with functional prediction (fp) weights using empirical variance, FBAT-v-e-grv FBAT-v with genotype risk value (grv) weights using empirical variance, FBAT-v-e-lor FBAT-v with log odds ratio (lor) weights using empirical variance, FBAT-v-e-ow FBAT-v with optimal weight (ow) weights using empirical variance