Skip to main content

Table 1 (abstract O28). Impaired cognition score for cognition performance based on the development and prediction datasets

From: Proceedings of the 4th National Big Data Health Science Conference

 

Tertiles of impaired cognition scores *

Tertile 1

Tertile 2

Tertile 3

NHANES III (training dataset)

 Impaired cognition score based on logistic model

  Cases/Controls †

27/1186

91/1123

217/996

  Model 1, OR (95% CI) ‡

1.00 (reference)

3.56 (2.30-5.51)

9.57 (6.36-14.4)

  Model 2, OR (95% CI) §

1.00 (reference)

3.18 (2.05-4.94)

8.15 (5.36-12.4)

 Impaired cognition score based on SVM model

  Cases/Controls

25/1188

82/1132

228/985

  Model 1, OR (95% CI)

1.00 (reference)

3.44 (2.18-5.43)

11.0 (7.22-16.8)

  Model 2, OR (95% CI)

1.00 (reference)

3.18 (2.01-5.04)

8.77 (5.57-13.8)

NHANES 2011-2014 (validation dataset)

 Impaired cognition score based on logistic model

  Cases/Controls

25/811

47/790

113/724

  Model 1, OR (95% CI)

1.00 (reference)

1.93 (1.18-3.17)

5.06 (3.25-7.90)

  Model 2, OR (95% CI)

1.00 (reference)

1.66 (0.99-2.76)

4.31 (2.62-7.08)

 Impaired cognition score based on SVM model

  Cases/Controls

21/815

44/793

120/717

  Model 1, OR (95% CI)

1.00 (reference)

2.15 (1.27-3.65)

6.50 (4.04-10.4)

  Model 2, OR (95% CI)

1.00 (reference)

1.59 (0.92-2.74)

3.95 (2.34-6.66)

  1. NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; SVM, support vector machine; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
  2. * The tertiles was based on the distribution of all participants
  3. † Poor cognition performance was defined as the lowest 10% of the distribution of the MMSE score (NHANES III) or a composite score based on the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD), the Animal Fluency (AF), and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) tests (NHANES 2011-2014)
  4. ‡ Model 1 is the crude model without any adjustments
  5. § Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, and race