Skip to main content

Table 2 Impact of the mappings SW → GO and INTERPRO → GO.

From: Towards a semi-automatic functional annotation tool based on decision-tree techniques

Organism

GO

SW keywords

INTERPRO

Number of descriptors

L. sakei

620/875 (+41,1%)

230/49 (-78,7%)

715/120 (-83,2%)

1565/1044 (-33,3%)

L. bulgaricus

599/876 (+46,2%)

223/46 (-80,2%)

1056/199 (-81,1%)

1878/1121 (-40,3%)

  1. L. sakei and L. bulgaricus numbers of GO-terms, SW keywords and INTERPRO motifs with and without the mapping SW → GO, INTERPRO → GO. a/b (c%): a is the number of different descriptors used without mappings, b is the number of different descriptors used with mappings, c is the number of descriptors "saved" when carrying out the mapping (in%).
Back to article page

BMC Proceedings

ISSN: 1753-6561

Contact us