Figure 3
From: MetaPath: identifying differentially abundant metabolic pathways in metagenomic datasets
Comparison of statistical methods for discovering significantreactions in simulated datasets.Four methods are evaluated: discovering active subnetworks using simulatedannealing (Anneal) and greedy search (Greedy) [13], discovering significantindividual reactions using Metastats [9], finding differentially abundant KEGGdefinedpathways (KEGGPath), and MetaPath. Four datasets are created by varyingthe number of significant reactions n and their significances.