Table 3 Comparison of submitted results: additive variance explained by the mapped QTL
From: Comparison of analyses of the QTLMAS XIV common dataset. II: QTL analysis
Participant | Mapped additive QTL (30 true QTL) | Percentage of additive variance contributed by mapped QTL | |
|---|---|---|---|
True | Estimated | ||
Bouwman et al. | 5 | 27.6 | 26.7 |
Calus et al. | 10 | 47.9 | 54.4 |
Coster and Calus | 2 | 7.7 | 6.8 |
Nettelblad | |||
Method A | 2 | 21.8 | 24.8 |
Method B | 3 | 23.7 | 19.1 |
Sun et al. | |||
Stringent | 11 | 48.9 | 61.5 |
Liberal | 13 | 58.7 | 62.5 |