Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison simulated and detected QTL for the quantitative (Q) and binary (B) trait.

From: A Bayesian approach to detect QTL affecting a simulated binary and quantitative trait

Simulated

 

Detectedc

Q

B

   

var

Q

B

QTL

QTL

Chr

Position

SNPb

QTL

SNP

Position

SNP

Position

1

*

1

7,536,081

R152

1.84

  

145

7,149,725

2

*

1

50,389,545

R960

1.13

959

50,316,379

  

3

*

1

58,038,782

R1106

1.09

  

1102

57,850,647

4

*

1

63,386,317

L1226

1.19

1215

63,017,238

1215

63,017,238

5

*

2

2,289,495

R2036

0.97

  

2033

2,213,453

6

*

2

30,511,220

L2675

0.48

2658

29,667,353

  

8

*

2

67,248,417

L3414

0.87

3405

66,759,090

3421

67,468,328

11

*

2

94,680,408

L3946

0.40

3948

94,982,901

3948

94,982,901

12

*

2

95,449,160

R3959

1.13

  

3961

95,493,425

14

*

3

22,415,527

L4483

4.50

4485

22,443,619

4480

22,030,629

17a

 

3

71,610,807

5488

4.49

5488

71,610,807

  

18

*

3

78,153,081

R5616

0.29

  

5616

78,155,543

22

*

4

6,296,223

R6224

0.57

  

6217

5,977,635

24

 

4

26,749,857

R6684

0.14

6703

27,663,560

  

30

*

4

97,651,414

R8024

0.72

  

8030

97,774,814

31a

Epi

1

49,185,089

939

7.01

939

79,185,089

  

32a

Epi

1

50,316,379

959

 

959

50,316,379

  

33a

Epi

2

32,617,381

2715

4.18

2719

32,741,451

  

34a

Epi

2

33,139,075

2727

 

2719

32,741,451

  

36a

Imp

2

78,604,040

3623

2.20

3623

78,604,040

  
  1. * QTL had pleiotropic effect (affected also binary trait)
  2. Epi: epistatic QTL pair 1 (31-32) and 2 (33-34), only affecting the quantitative trait
  3. Imp: paternally imprinted QTL, only affecting the quantitative trait
  4. a QTL was on chip
  5. b Closest SNP to the right (R) or left (L) of the QTL
  6. c QTL were considered detected if the position was within 1Mbp from the simulated QTL.