Table 1 Putative QTL for DBH and basic density identified by CIM in E. grandis and E. urophylla BC mapping population.
Parent tree | Total number of QTLs identified | Linkage group (LG) number for DBH | Linkage group (LG) number for density | Percentage of variation explained by the DBH QTLs | Percentage of variation explained by the density of QTLs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. grandis backcross parent | 3 | LG9, LG10 | LG2 | 3.6 to 4.6% | 4.8% |
E. grandis F1 hybrid parent | 7 | LG4, LG6, LG10 | LG1, LG3, LG4, LG10 | 3.7 to 9.6% | 3.1 to 5.5% |
E. urophylla F1 hybrid parent | 8 | LG6 | LG2, LG4, LG6, LG8, LG9, LG10a, LG10b | 7.0% | 3.6 to 13.1% |
E. urophylla backcross parent | 6 | LG4, LG9, LG10 | LG4, LG8, LG9 | 4.5-5.3% | 4.6-7.8% |
Total | 24 | 9 | 15 | Â | Â |