Table 2 Comparison of QTL mapping results
From: Comparison of the analyses of the XVth QTLMAS common dataset II: QTL analysis
Method | Authors | QTL detected | False positives | Missing QTL (a) | Mean distance to the QTL (cM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBLUP | Zeng | 5 | 0 | 3,5,8 | 1.32 |
BayesB | Zeng | 6 | 3 | 7,8 | 1.21 |
BayesC | Dashab | 7 | 2 | 8 | 0.96 |
BayesCÏ€ | Schurink | 5 | 0 | 5,6,8 | 0.83 |
| Â | Zeng | 5 | 1 | 6,7,8 | 0.45 |
LASSO1 | Usai | 7 | Numerous | 6 | 0.83 |
LASSO2 | Usai | 7 | Numerous | 6 | 0.74 |
LASSO3 | Usai | 7 | Numerous | 6 | 0.29 |
MM single SNP | Dashab | 5 | 3 | 3,6,8 | 0.73 |
MM Haplotype | Dashab | 5 | 6 | 2,6,8 | 0.61 |
MM Phylogeny | Dashab | 7 | 5 | 8 | 1.07 |
EMMAX | Fu | 3 | 1 | 3,5,6,7,8 | 0.43 |