Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of QTL effect estimations

From: Comparison of the analyses of the XVth QTLMAS common dataset II: QTL analysis

Chromosome

 

Chr1

Chr2

Chr2

Chr3

Chr3

Chr4

Chr5

Chr5

True effect1

 

12.

2.

2.

2.

2.

4.

1.272

1.273

GBLUP

Zeng

4.39

1.92

 

2.31

 

1.18

1.34

 

BayesB

Zeng

2.17

0.68

0.62

0.2

0.15

0.13

  

BayesC

Dashab

        

BayesCÏ€

Schurink

1.92

1.28

0.84

1.24

0.97

   
 

Zeng

7.01

0.69

0.66

1.18

0.24

   

LASSO1

Usai

2.22

0.71

0.48

1.43

0.15

0.2

0.12

 

LASSO2

Usai

2.09

1.39

2.18

1.67

0.38

0.23

1.42

 

LASSO3

Usai

2.22

1.01

0.56

1.58

0.29

0.01

0.67

 

MM single SNP

Dashab

4.19

2.1

 

2.71

0.65

 

1.31

 

MM Haplotype

Dashab

        

MM Phylogeny

Dashab

        

EMMAX

Fu

4.39

2.08

2.46

     
  1. 1 Apparent difference between homozygous in trait units
  2. 2 Only 63.6% of the homozygous individuals, which were also homozygous for the second interacting QTL, expressed the 2 trait unit effect of this 1st QTL
  3. 3Only 63.6% of the homozygous individuals, which were also homozygous for the first interacting QTL, expressed the 2 trait unit effect of this 2nd QTL