Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of QTL mapping results

From: XVIth QTLMAS: simulated dataset and comparative analysis of submitted results for QTL mapping and genomic evaluation

Method False
positive
True
QTL
Proportion of genetic variance explained1
  T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
RR_YD 9 15 5 8 6 8 0.78 0.78 0.82
RR_YDadj 7 8 4 5 5 7 0.57 0.75 0.79
GRAMMAR 0 0 0 2 3 5 0.34 0.58 0.74
RHM20 1 0 0 6 4 7 0.61 0.61 0.80
GRM_CG_MT 2 0 0 3 3 5 0.42 0.58 0.74
GRM_CG_ST 0 0 0 3 3 5 0.43 0.58 0.74
GRM_CG_YD 0 1 0 4 4 5 0.54 0.63 0.74
RF_MT 7 3 2 1 2 4 0.27 0.53 0.67
RF_ST 5 3 4 1 2 5 0.27 0.53 0.71
RF_YD 3 2 0 3 3 5 0.42 0.59 0.71
LDLA 3 3 1 6 2 5 0.61 0.53 0.60
DMU 3 1 0 6 3 4 0.62 0.58 0.67
SEL-GEN 5 5 6 4 2 3 0.45 0.40 0.32
LA 4 3 1 0 1 2 0.00 0.02 0.29
detectable QTL     13 12 13 0.88 0.89 0.98
  1. 1 2pqα 2 x x 2