Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of predicted direct genomic values (DGV) with true breeding values (TBV)

From: XVIth QTLMAS: simulated dataset and comparative analysis of submitted results for QTL mapping and genomic evaluation

   

T1

 

T2

 

T3

AU1

Methods

rDGV

bDGV

rDGV

bDGV

rDGV

bDGV

PW

Horseshoe

0.79

1.06*

0.83

1.02

0.82

1.02

 

BayesA

0.79

1.06*

0.83

1.03

0.83

1.03

 

BayesB

0.79

1.06*

0.83

1.03

0.83

1.03

 

BayesC

0.79

1.07*

0.82

1.02

0.82

1.01

 

BayesLasso

0.77

1.11*

0.81

1.10*

0.79

1.03

 

GBLUP

0.74

1.16*

0.77

1.16*

0.76

1.08*

OG

GBRIDGE

0.78

1.06

0.78

0.86

0.83

1.01

 

GMCP

0.76

1.04

0.81

1.01

0.82

1.08

 

GLASSO

0.79

1.25

0.85

1.22

0.84

1.20

 

GSCAD

0.78

1.05

0.84

1.02

0.82

1.01

 

sgLASSO

0.80

1.34

0.85

1.26

0.82

1.07

  1. 1 Author: PW = Pong-Wong [10]; OG = Ogutu [11]
  2. 2 Only the best results among group sizes were provided.
  3. * significantly (p < 0.05) differs from 1
  4. § significance could not be assessed