Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of predicted direct genomic values (DGV) with true breeding values (TBV)

From: XVIth QTLMAS: simulated dataset and comparative analysis of submitted results for QTL mapping and genomic evaluation

    T1   T2   T3
AU1 Methods rDGV bDGV rDGV bDGV rDGV bDGV
PW Horseshoe 0.79 1.06* 0.83 1.02 0.82 1.02
  BayesA 0.79 1.06* 0.83 1.03 0.83 1.03
  BayesB 0.79 1.06* 0.83 1.03 0.83 1.03
  BayesC 0.79 1.07* 0.82 1.02 0.82 1.01
  BayesLasso 0.77 1.11* 0.81 1.10* 0.79 1.03
  GBLUP 0.74 1.16* 0.77 1.16* 0.76 1.08*
OG GBRIDGE 0.78 1.06 0.78 0.86 0.83 1.01
  GMCP 0.76 1.04 0.81 1.01 0.82 1.08
  GLASSO 0.79 1.25 0.85 1.22 0.84 1.20
  GSCAD 0.78 1.05 0.84 1.02 0.82 1.01
  sgLASSO 0.80 1.34 0.85 1.26 0.82 1.07
  1. 1 Author: PW = Pong-Wong [10]; OG = Ogutu [11]
  2. 2 Only the best results among group sizes were provided.
  3. * significantly (p < 0.05) differs from 1
  4. § significance could not be assessed