Skip to main content

Table 1 Pearson correlation between the true and predicted genomic breeding values for group bridge, MCP, lasso and SCAD for trait T1 based on systematic groups.

From: Regularized group regression methods for genomic prediction: Bridge, MCP, SCAD, group bridge, group lasso, sparse group lasso, group MCP and group SCAD

Group size

Penalty selected by AIC

Penalty selected by BIC

 

Bridge

MCP

Lasso

SCAD

SGLasso

Bridge

MCP

Lasso

SCAD

1

0.682

0.758

0.778

0.767

0.781

0.682

0.768

0.773

0.652

10

0.770

0.759

0.793

0.788

0.787

0.753

0.772

0.747

0.735

20

0.774

0.761

0.788

0.770

0.787

0.777

0.772

0.756

0.667

30

0.758

0.760

0.790

0.774

0.787

0.787

0.771

0.753

0.644

40

0.769

0.761

0.789

0.758

0.787

0.771

0.772

0.754

0.595

50

0.774

0.761

0.780

0.740

0.791

0.763

0.770

0.732

0.579

60

0.765

0.760

0.784

0.750

0.791

0.765

0.771

0.706

0.581

70

0.771

0.760

0.779

0.760

0.789

0.757

0.770

0.718

0.619

80

0.781

0.761

0.776

0.759

0.795

0.747

0.770

0.721

0.550

90

0.761

0.760

0.774

0.748

0.781

0.743

0.770

0.709

0.478

100

0.771

0.760

0.778

0.706

0.790

0.760

0.770

0.704

0.502

  1. Although listed under AIC, SGLasso used only 10-fold cross validation. The Pearson correlation for ridge regression for comparison is 0.737.