Skip to main content

Table 1 (abstract A30). Results of a cross-sectional survey of the AEFI surveillance system, Pipalkheda and Gyaraspur blocks, Vidisha district, Madhya Pradesh, India, March 2018

From: Proceedings of ‘FETP-ICON 2020’ Conference

Attribute and indicator

Numerator

Denominator

Results,

n/N (%)

Simplicity

 • Proportion of ANMs aware of AEFI reporting

No. of ANMs aware of case definition and reporting

No. of ANMs

Interviewed

2/8 (25)

 • Proportion of MOs aware of AEFI reporting

No. of MOs aware of case definition and reporting

No. of MOs interviewed

1/4 (25)

 • MOs able to classify AEFIs

No. of MOs able to classify AEFIs

No. of MOs interviewed

0/4 (0)

Flexibility

 • Proportion of reports uploaded to SAFE-VAC

No of reports of AEFIs uploaded to SAFE-VAC

No of reports of AEFIs reviewed

0/15 (0)

 • Proportion of AEFI documents sent to state through email

No. of AEFI reports sent through email

No of reports of AEFIs reviewed

13/15 (87)

Acceptability

 • Use of standard formats at all levels

Availability of standard forms at RUs

No. of RUs where record reviewed

3/3 (100)

 • Proportion of AEFIs reported by RUs

No. of cases reported in H002

Total AEFIs

2/4 (50)

 • Proportion of reported AEFIs investigated

No. of cases investigated

No. of AEFI cases on line list

0/2 (0)

Sensitivity

 • Proportion of AEFI reported against expected

No. of AEFIs reported

No. of surviving infants in Vidisha district

5/45,068

(111/1,000,000)

No. of AEFIs reported

No. of surviving infants in block Pipalkheda

3/9,948

(301/1,000,000)

No. of AEFIs reported

No. of surviving infants in block Gyaraspur

1/3,808

(262/1,000,000)

Data quality

 • Proportion of reported persons with symptoms written in AEFI tracking register

No. of reported persons with symptoms in AEFI tracking register

No. of reported persons written in AEFI tracking register

232/232 (100)

 • Proportion of AEFIs reported in H002

No. of AEFIs reported in H002

Total AEFIs

2/4 (50)

 • Proportion of reported AEFIs investigated

No. of AEFIs investigated

Total AEFIs in line list

0/2 (0)

 • Proportion of Investigated AEFIs documented at blocks

No. of investigated AEFIs documented at block

Total AEFIs investigated in block

0/4 (0)

Representativeness

 • Proportion of blocks reported AEFI cases

No. of blocks reporting AEFIs

No. of blocks

3/7 (47)

 • Proportion of government RU reporting sending weekly reports

No. of government RUs sending weekly reports

No. of government RUs

11/11 (100)

 • Proportion of private. RUs sending weekly reports

No. of private RUs sending weekly reports

No. of private RUs

3/3 (100)

Timeliness

 • Proportion of reports (H002, CRF, PCIF, FCIF) sent to appropriate level within expected timeline

No. of H002 sent

No. of AEFIs with H002 to be filled

616/728 (85)

No. of CRF sent

No. of AEFIs with CRF to be filled

5/5 (100)

No. of PCIF sent

No. of AEFIs with PCIF to be filled

5/5 (100)

No. of FCIF sent

No. of AEFIs with FCIF to be filled

3/5 (60)

Stability

 • Proportion of weekly reports physically present at district

No. of H002 available at district

No. of AEFIs with H002 to be filled

67/728 (9)

 • Proportion of blocks having AEFI tracking register,

No of blocks having AEFI tracking register

No. of blocks

2/2 (100)

 • H002 booklet and CRF

No of blocks having H002 booklet and blank CRF

No. of blocks

1/1 (100)

 • Availability of PCIF and FCIF at district

No of districts having blank PCIF and FCIF available

No. of districts

1/1 (100)