Volume 5 Supplement 7

IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference 2011: From Genomes to Integration and Delivery

Open Access

Microsatellite variability between apricot and related Prunusspecies

BMC Proceedings20115(Suppl 7):P10

DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P10

Published: 13 September 2011

Background

Apricots, family Rosaceae, are economically important representatives of the genus Prunus. The number of apricot species ranges from three to ten, depending on the classification system adopted. The major obstacles to expansion of apricot production are irregular yields and low resistance to diseases. Compared with the high genetic variability in related species, apricots are not so variable and thus interspecific hybrids were proposed as a means to overcome deficiencies inherent in the common apricot. To estimate the extent of variation in apricot germplasm, between ecogeographical groups and related species, is very useful for planning breeding programmes, through diversity analysis, cultivar identification or marker-assisted selection.

Methods

One hundred accessions of P. armeniaca representing the European, Irano-Caucasian, Central Asian and North American genepool, three accessions of P. mandshurica and one accession each of P. ansu, P. brigantiaca, the interspecific hybrid Plumcot,P. x dasycarpa, P. mume, P. siberica were analysed with 10 apricot SSR loci on an ABI 3100 capillary sequencer [1]. A total of 196 alleles were detected varying from 11 to 27 with an average of 16.9. Out of them, 59 alleles occurred only oce (so-called private alleles). 34 (58%) private alleles were also found in related species. Non- amplified alleles were observed in four samples of the related species (P. siberica and P.brigantina). FST values ranged from 0.5121 to 0.3503, with an average of 0.4459 (Table 1). It is known, that FST values up to 0.05 indicate negligible genetic differentiation whereas >0.25 means very great genetic differentiation within the population analyzed. In Prunus, high levels of genetic differentiation could be explained by the mating system. The data indicate a low gene flow (as described by Nm; Table 1). These results could be attributed to different geographic origins of the species or the influence of the breeding strategy.
Table 1

Variability parameters calculated for 10 SSR markers in 100 apricot cultivars origin of five ecogeogrphical region and related species using POPGENE

Locus

Number of putative alleles

Effective alleles per locus(Ne)

Observed heterozygosity (Ho)

Expected heterozygosity (He)

Inbreeding coefficient (FST)

Gene flow (Nm)

SsrPaCITA7

18

4.6280

0.8091

0.7875

0.4252

0.3380

ssrPaCITA10

21

4.4906

0.5545

0.7809

0.4461

0.3105

ssrPaCITA19

14

4.1052

0.7636

0.7599

0.5121

0.2382

ssrPaCITA23

11

4.5846

0.5872

0.7855

0.4951

0.2550

ssrPaCITA27

12

2.9979

0.3738

0.6696

0.6130

0.1578

UDAp-407

27

7.2979

0.7182

0.8669

0.3823

0.4039

UDAp-410

15

5.5415

0.8440

0.8233

0.4493

0.3064

UDAp-414

20

5.3862

0.5000

0.8181

0.3503

0.4636

UDAp-415

15

3.7162

0.6273

0.7342

0.4072

0.3640

UDAp-420

16

3.5567

0.5909

0.7221

0.4102

0.3594

Mean

16.9

4.6305

0.6369

0.7748

0.4459

0.3107

St.Dev

4.77

1.2233

0.1471

0.0565

-

-

Results and conclusions

Genetic similarity among common apricots and related species was quantified using Nei´s [2] genetic distance and genetic identity based on allele frequencies (data not shown). The lowest genetic identity (0.000) was found among P. mandshurica, P. brigantina, P.mume and P. dasycarpa, and between Plumcot and P. mume. The highest genetic identities (0.81) were found between Western European and North American accesssions and among Irano Caucasian and Eastern European groups. To demonstrate the genetic relationship between common apricots from different ecogeographic regions and related species, a neighbor joining dendrogram based on genetic distance was produced (Figure 1). The accessions are divided into two groups, one containing all common apricots and hybrids thereof, and the other containing all related species. In general, results show that the common apricots are remote from related species. The tree supports that the P. x dasycarpa and Plumcot, known to be a P. armeniaca hybrid, are intermediates between common apricot and other related species. P. ansu and P. siberica appear distant from the others accessions, and in fact they are the most distanctly related species. It is interesting to known that some authors even consider P. ansu as a separate species [3]. In this study P. siberica, the species having the largest distribution area of all apricot species, and P. mandshurica, being present in the very cold area, cluster together. In the analyses they appear far from the common apricot species, which confirms them as being markedly different from P. armeniaca. Maghuly et al. [1] described that P. x dasycarpa, P. brigantiaca and Plumcot were distant from the common apricot cluster. In fact, P. brigantiaca is the most distantly related species, while P. x dasycarpa, a hybrid between P. armeniaca x P. cerasifera, was found intermediate between the apricot groups and Plumcot, which is a hybrid between P. armeniaca and P. salicinia.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1753-6561-5-S7-P10/MediaObjects/12919_2011_Article_728_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Neighbor joining dendrogram for apricots from five ecogeographical groups and related species.

Results to date indicate that crosses between apricot and apricot related species are successful, when made in either direction and the resulting hybrids are viable [3]. In this manner, P. mandshurica and P. siberica were used in common apricot breeding as a source of cold hardiness [4]. Likewise, adaptation to humid climates should be easy to transmit through hybridization with P. mume and P. armeniaca var. ansu. In addition, Rubio et al. [5] suggested P. manchurica as the possible origin of the apricot cultivars resistance to Sharka. It should be emphasiszed that in the interest of still further extending the genetic diversity available for posterity, additional efforts should be committed to the systematic exploration for unique phenotypes of apricots, and also of related species.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Plant Biotechnology Unit (PBU), Dept. Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences

References

  1. Maghuly F, Borroto Fernandez E, Ruther S, Bistray G, Pedryc A, Laimer M: Microsatellite variability in apricots (Prunus armeniaca L.) reflects their geographic origin and breeding history. Tree Genetics and Genomes. 2005, 1: 151-165. 10.1007/s11295-005-0018-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Nei M: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978, 89: 583-590.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mehlenbacher SA, Cociu V, Hough F: Apricot (Prunus). Genetic resource of temperate fruit and nut crops. Edited by: Moore JN and Ballington RJ. 1991, ISHS Wageningen, 65-107.Google Scholar
  4. Paunovic SA: Apricot germplasm, breeding, selection, cultivar, rootstock and environment. Acta Hort. 1988, 209: 13-28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Rubio M, Dicenta F, Martínez-Gómez P: Susceptibility to sharka (Plum pox virus) inPrunus mandshurica x Prunus armeniaca seedlings. Plant Breeding. 2003, 122: 465-466. 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00902.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Maghuly and Laimer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement