Table 2 Comparison of the detected QTL with the simulated data.
From: QTL detection for a medium density SNP panel: comparison of different LD and LA methods
QTLMAS | QTLMAP | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trait | Chr | Location | Effect | Location | Effect | Traits affected | Δ location |
Ass | 1 | 42.5 | 29.3 | 43.6 | 17 | P0 to P530 | 1.2 |
Ass | 2 | 4.6 | 7.1 | 3.7 | 8 | P530 | 0.9 |
Ass | 2 | 88.6 | 3.7 | - | - | - | - |
Ass | 3 | 89.9 | 4.1 | 92.3 | 7 | P132 to P530 | 2.4 |
Ass | 4 | 70 | 3.3 | 65.3 | 8 | P265 to P530 | 4.7 |
Ass | 5 | 77.2 | 2.5 | 72.1 | 8 | P397 to P530 | 5.1 |
Growth | 1 | 87.7 | 23.4 | - | - | - | - |
Growth | 2 | 48.9 | 4.8 | 42.7 | 9 | P0 to P530 | 6.2 |
Growth | 3 | 26.2 | 4.7 | 17.3 | 7 | P0 | 8.9 |
Growth | 4 | 9.6 | 5.9 | 9.3 | - | P0 to P 132 | 0.3 |
Growth | 4 | 86.4 | 6.6 | - | - | - | - |
Growth | 5 | 31.5 | 4.6 | - | - | - | - |
Inf | 1 | 54.3 | 32.3 | - | - | - | - |
Inf | 2 | 33 | 3.5 | - | - | - | - |
Inf | 3 | 6.9 | 3.5 | 1.3 | - | P0 to P530 | 5.6 |
Inf | 3 | 56.1 | 3.8 | 48.7 | - | P265 to P530 | 7.4 |
Inf | 4 | 36.5 | 3.2 | - | - | - | - |
Inf | 5 | 59.7 | 3.7 | - | - | - | - |
FALSE | 4 | 86.4 | 6.6 | 75.3 | 6 | P0 to P132 | 11.1 |
FALSE | 5 | 59.7 | 3.7 | 94.1 | 13 | P0 to P265 | 16.9 |
FALSE | 5 | - | - | 80 | - | P132 to P530 | - |