Table 3 The comparison of the applied approaches used by participants for estimation of genomic breeding value of binary trait.
From: Comparison of analyses of the QTLMAS XIV common dataset. I: genomic selection
Approach no. | Authors | Method | Acc. | Reg. Coef. | MSD | Shared (%) | Loss (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Calus et al. [10]* | BayesA bivariate | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.33 | 60 | 20 |
2 | Calus et al. [10] | BayeaA univariate | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.47 | 53 | 28 |
3 | Calus et al. [10] | BayesC bivariate | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 64 | 15 |
4 | Calus et al. [10] | BayesC univariate | 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.37 | 56 | 22 |
5 | Calus et al. [10] | GBLUP bivariate | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.38 | 60 | 20 |
6 | Calus et al. [10] | GBLUP univariate | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.49 | 52 | 29 |
7 | Calus et al. [10] | Pedigree-BLUP univariate | 0.52 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 30 | 52 |
8 | Calus et al. [10] | Pedigree-BLUP bivariate | 0.47 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 28 | 52 |
12 | Coster and Calus[12] | PLSR1 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 1.40 | 20 | 71 |
13 | Nadaf et al. [13] | BayesB | 0.82 | 0.94 | 0.31 | 59 | 20 |
14 | Nadaf et al. [13] | BayesB + Pedigree information | 0.82 | 0.94 | 0.31 | 59 | 21 |
15 | Nadaf et al. [13] | GBLUP + Pedigree information | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.50 | 51 | 30 |
16 | Nadaf et al. [13] | GBLUP | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.50 | 51 | 29 |
21 | Shen et al. [15] | DHGLM2 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.49 | 50 | 29 |
26 | Zukowski et al. | GBLUP | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 38 | 47 |