Optimising infection prevention and control practice using behavior change: a systematic review
© Edwards et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Published: 29 June 2011
Introduction / objectives
Despite significant investment in infection prevention and control (IPC), there has been little consideration of the effectiveness of behaviour change interventions or the application of behavioural theory (BT) or social marketing (SM) to influence healthcare workers’ (HCWs) behaviour and to reduce healthcare associated infection.
This review used a systematic process to assess the effectiveness of intervention studies focused on behaviour change within IPC and the extent to which BT or SM has been applied. Exploratory studies that seek to understand influences on HCWs behaviour in IPC were reviewed. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, ASSIA, Business Source Complete, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, DARE and HMIC for studies performed between 1999-2009.
Twenty studies met the quality criteria. Few behaviour change interventions of sufficient methodological quality or adequate evaluation design were identified. Of the seven included intervention studies, few explicitly considered BT, used SM or addressed sustainability. Exploratory studies highlighted some key social and cultural determinants of HCW behaviour in IPC.
The quality of interventions aimed at changing the IPC behaviours of HCWs is poor and there has been limited application of BT or SM in methodologically robust study designs. We recommend that quality criteria be established and added to existing guidelines to ensure robust design, implementation and reporting of behaviour change interventions in IPC.
Disclosure of interest
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.