- Poster presentation
- Open Access
The aerodynamic behaviour of respiratory aerosols
- K Grosskopf1
© Grosskopf; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Published: 29 June 2011
- Healthcare Work
- Ventilation System
- Spatial Dispersion
- Alveolar Region
- Building System
Hospital acquired infections (HAIs) claim on average 90,000 lives each year in the U.S., nearly three times the number of annual highway deaths. Although fewer than 15% of HAIs are directly attributable to airborne transmission, more than a third may be caused by surface microbes aerosolized by the movement of air from building systems, people and equipment. As a result, a study was devised to use a synthetic respiratory aerosol to track the movement airborne contagion with respect to various environmental conditions in a healthcare environment.
An actual hospital was used to map the spatial dispersion of synthetic respiratory aerosols with respect to particle size, airflow, door position and healthcare worker movement between a general patient room and corridor.
Respirable aerosols 0.5µm to <1.0µm were found to exhibit distinctly different aerodynamic behaviours when compared to aerosols 1.0µm -10.0µm. Specifically, aerosols <1.0µm appeared to disperse randomly and uniformly throughout the test space with significantly less regard to mechanical airflow, pressure relationships, door position, and personnel movement when compared to aerosols 1.0µm -10.0µm.
Since expiratory droplets <1.0µm are believed to be both capable of carrying virus and penetrating into the alveolar region of the lung, these particles may present unique challenges for ventilation systems designed to protect the healthcare population from airborne viral transmission.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.