Table 1 Accuracy (se) of GS in the first and second generation without and with dominance effects for six different scenarios and accuracy of phenotypic selection (30 replicates)
From: Genomic selection in tree breeding: testing accuracy of prediction models including dominance effect
ratio | QTL distribution: small effects | QTL distribution: medium effect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dominance variance/additivevariance | Phenotypic selection | Model without dominance | Model with dominance | Phenotypic selection | Model without dominance | Model with dominance |
First generation | Â | |||||
0.1 | 0.52(0.03) | 0.80(0.03) | 0.81 (0.03) | 0.53(0.03) | 0.79 (0.03) | 0.80(0.03) |
0.5 | 0.51(0.03) | 0.70 (0.05) | 0.73 (0.04) | 0.53(0.04) | 0.68 (0.04) | 0.73(0.04) |
1 | 0.51(0.03) | 0.61(0.06) | 0.69(0.05) | 0.53(0.03) | 0.64(0.04) | 0.71(0.04) |
Second generation | Â | |||||
0.1 | NO | 0.63(0.13) | 0.63(0.13) | NO | 0.62(0.08) | 0.62(0.08) |
0.5 | NO | 0.53(0.13) | 0.55(0.12) | NO | 0.53(0.11) | 0.54(0.10) |
1 | NO | 0.42(0.13) | 0.48(0.13) | NO | 0.42(0.10) | 0.47(0.9) |