Method | Ref. | Feat. | SE | SP |
G
m
|
|---|
Triplet-SVM | [9] | 32 | 93.30% | 88.10% | 90.66% |
miRabela | [8] | 40 | 71.00% | 97.00% | 82.99% |
miPred | [12] | 34 | 89.35% | 93.21% | 91.26% |
miPred | [12] | 29 | 84.55% | 97.97% | 91.01% |
microPred | [13] | 21 | 90.02% | 98.28% | 93.58% |
miLDR-EM | - | 3 | 88.13% | 96.45% | 92.20% |
miLDR-EM | - | 7 | 89.15% | 96.84% | 92.91% |
- Performance comparison of miLDR-EM with previously proposed methods. The first column contains the name of the method being compared, the second column contains the number of features being used by that method, and the subsequent columns represent SE, SP and G
m
respectively. For all previous methods, the results in the table are those reported in [13].
