Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Proceedings

Open Access

The total wrist arthroplasty

  • Amit Gupta1
BMC Proceedings20159(Suppl 3):A86

https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-9-S3-A86

Published: 19 May 2015

Traditional management of wrist arthritis consists of proximal row carpectomy, partial carpal fusions, or, in the event of pancarpal arthritis, total wrist fusion. Although proximal row carpectomy and partial wrist fusions preserve some motion at the wrist while relieving pain symptoms, the quality of results obtained from these procedures is not predictable or optimal in many instances. Total wrist fusions are credited with universal pain relief at the expense of wrist motion. However, critical analysis of the results of total wrist arthrodesis shows that the results are not always consistent with what has been claimed and that pain relief is unpredictable at best. In a recent study, 14 of 22 patients who had undergone wrist arthrodesis had residual pain, and 4 of these patients had severe pain 6 years later. In another study, only 6 of 36 patients remained pain-free 4 years after wrist arthrodesis.

Moreover, many patients do not like loss of motion in their wrists. In a study of wrist arthrodesis, only 40% of patients were satisfied at 1 year. In another study, 100% of patients who had wrist arthrodesis indicated that they would have a procedure performed so they could move their wrists again.

Management of hip, knee, ankle, and shoulder joints has evolved from arthrodesis to arthroplasty. The wrist joint awaits the same pattern of evolution with the advent of reliable designs.

In this presentation, I will first describe the design rationale of the Stryker ReMotion Total Wrist arthroplasty along with historical antecedents. Next, I will outline the technique of implantation with tips and tricks for special situations. Finally, I will discuss 10-year results and comment on future prospects of total wrist arthroplasty.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Louisville

Copyright

© Gupta; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement