Table 1 (abstract A41). Factors that influence variations in both systems of VPD Surveillance and factors which could synchronize and improve VPD Surveillance data in Chhattisgarh, 2019
Categories | Indicators | (%) |
|---|---|---|
Factors that influence the variations in both data (n=133) | No Verification of both data sets | 92% |
Un availability of Sample kits in PHC | 60% | |
Variations in the number of reporting sites | 63% | |
Attended any Training about VPD surveillance by IDSP in the last year | 21% | |
No Epidemiological (Time Place Person - analysis) training to BMOs | 100% | |
No any Analytical person at the Block level | 100% | |
Don’t receive feedback or analytical report from districts regularly | 92% | |
Factors that could synchronize and improve VPD Surveillance data (n=70) | One nodal person for both WHO and IDSP Surveillance | 100% |
Weekly data synchronization at the district level | 83% | |
Active case search by BMOs in other MOs registers | 94% | |
Mobile app-based data entry | 94% | |
Integrating into one system | 92% |