Skip to main content

Table 1 (abstract A10). Frequency distribution of athlete’s influential persons during RWL

From: Novelties in Sport Sciences

Source of influence Group Not influential Little influential Unsure Somehow influential Very influential χ2 p
Fellow sambist Seniors 13 (54.2 %) 0 (0%) 5 (20.8%) 4 (16.7%) 2 (8.3%) 11.5 0.02*
Juniors 9 (39.1%) 8 (34.8%) 1 (4.3%) 3 (13%) 2 (8.7%)
Physician Seniors 12 (50%) 8 (33.3%) 0 (0%) 1 (4.2%) 3 (12.5%) 6.03 0.3
Juniors 16 (69.6%) 3 (13%) 1 (4.3%) 0 (0%) 2 (8.7%)
Coach Seniors 3 (12.5%) 2 (8.3%) 0 (0%) 11 (45.8%) 7 (29.2%) 5.02 0.29
Juniors 5 (21.7%) 3 (13%) 2 (8.7%) 5 (21.7%) 8 (34.8%)
Dietitian Seniors 15 (62.5%) 2 (8.3%) 2 (8.3%) 2 (8.3%) 3 (12.5%) 3.31 0.51
Juniors 17 (73.9%) 0 (0%) 2 (8.7%) 3 (13%) 1 (4.3%)
  1. Legend: 2-chi-square test; p-probability; *-significant