Table 1 (abstract A10). Frequency distribution of athlete’s influential persons during RWL
Source of influence | Group | Not influential | Little influential | Unsure | Somehow influential | Very influential | χ2 | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fellow sambist | Seniors | 13 (54.2 %) | 0 (0%) | 5 (20.8%) | 4 (16.7%) | 2 (8.3%) | 11.5 | 0.02* |
Juniors | 9 (39.1%) | 8 (34.8%) | 1 (4.3%) | 3 (13%) | 2 (8.7%) | |||
Physician | Seniors | 12 (50%) | 8 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.2%) | 3 (12.5%) | 6.03 | 0.3 |
Juniors | 16 (69.6%) | 3 (13%) | 1 (4.3%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (8.7%) | |||
Coach | Seniors | 3 (12.5%) | 2 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (45.8%) | 7 (29.2%) | 5.02 | 0.29 |
Juniors | 5 (21.7%) | 3 (13%) | 2 (8.7%) | 5 (21.7%) | 8 (34.8%) | |||
Dietitian | Seniors | 15 (62.5%) | 2 (8.3%) | 2 (8.3%) | 2 (8.3%) | 3 (12.5%) | 3.31 | 0.51 |
Juniors | 17 (73.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (8.7%) | 3 (13%) | 1 (4.3%) |