Skip to main content

Table 3 Consensus Building Workshop Evaluations (n = 5)

From: Precision Public Health Initiatives in Cancer: Proceedings from the Transdisciplinary Conference for Future Leaders in Precision Public Health

Criteria

Mean

Standard Deviation

Quality of information presented

4.2

0.5

Quality of visual aids and handouts

4

0.7

Facilitator’s knowledge of the subject

3.4

1.5

Facilitator’s ability to guide consensus building activities

3.4

1.5

Quality of overall Consensus Building Activities

3.6

0.9

The Consensus Building Workshops helped to develop Research Priorities for the field of Precision Public Health*

4.4

0.6

The Consensus Building Workshops covered materials that will be useful in my own work*

4.0

0.7

  1. Likert Scale: 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, 5 = Excellent, *Likert Scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree or disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree