Skip to main content

Advertisement

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

Poster presentation | Open | Published:

Micropropagation of Pinus taedaL. via axillary buds

Introduction

Pinus taeda stands for productivity and quality of its timber [1]. Researches using biotechnology are of great importance and have been applied to the improvement of its timber and plantation [2]. The main method of Pinus propagation is by seeds, once the minicuttings depends on the season of the year or depends of juvenile material [35]. Thus, researches on micropropagation of Pinus taeda are currently a priority in Brazil [6]. Micropropagation is the best method for mass production of superior genotypes and represents a strategy for tree improvement and capture of genetic gains [7]. Studies on Pinus taeda micropropagation by axillary bud proliferation are quite few. The purpose of this study was to develop a protocol for micropropagation of this species from juvenile material.

Materials and methods

For in vitro establishment two to four month old seedlings were used. Apical shoots and nodal segments of 3 cm length were inoculated in MS [8], DCR [9], WV3 [10] or WV5 [11] medium. For axillary shoots induction, the explants were inoculated in WV3, WV5 or DCR medium, with BAP (0, 0.12, 0.25 and 0.50 μM). For the induction of roots, we tested the effect of double-layer medium, with semi-solid phase consisting of agar and water or GDm/2 [12] medium and the liquid phase containing water or GDm/2 medium. Both phases were supplemented with 2.69 μM NAA and 0.44 μM BAP for 9 days, followed by transfer to growth regulator-free GDm/2 medium. The rooted plants were planted in Plantmax® Forestry substrate and maintained in a greenhouse.

Results and Discussion

Nodal segments showed better responses during in vitro establishment, with up to 100% of explants forming axillary shoots and an average of 4.3 to 5.8 shoots per explant. The WV5 media proved better and presented the highest survival rate (86.0%) and highest elongation percentage (85.2%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Nodal segments of Pinus taeda inoculated in WV5 medium, after nine weeks in the in vitro establishment. Bar: 1 cm.

The balance of salts in WV5 and WV3 culture media favored an optimal development of in vitro cultures of Pinus taeda due to its lower concentration of N in comparison with MS medium and to higher concentrations of thiamine and inositol, which are growth promoters. Elongated shoots were subdivided into segments, increasing the multiplication rate to 3 segments per shoot. The majority of BAP treatments did not promote better multiplication when compared to control. However, the alternate use of 0.12 μM BAP added to WV5 culture medium during initial culture and a BAP-free medium during the 1st subculture can increase the multiplication rate. The estimated production was 1024 shoots from 100 explants, in seven months of cultivation. The best rooting percentage (37.5%) was obtained in shoots treated with 2.69 μM NAA and 0.44 μM BAP for 9 days in culture medium composed of water and agar without liquid phase, followed by transfer to growth regulator-free GDm/2 medium. The double-layer medium did not increase the rooting percentage. This result was higher than that found in Pinus virginiana, when the same combination of plant growth regulators was used [13]. The roots originated directly and indirectly from the stem with callus formation. After 90 days of acclimatization, the survival rate was 90% and an average of 4.6 roots per plant was obtained (Figure 2). This result was better than that obtained in other study with Pinus taeda that reported 38% of necrosis five weeks after transplantation [14]. Micropropagation of Pinus taeda from axillary buds and juvenile material is feasible, but requires further studies to optimize the rooting stage.

Figure 2
figure2

Micropropagated plants of Pinus taeda, 60 days after transplanted and acclimated. Bar: 5 cm.

References

  1. 1.

    Schultz RI: Genetics and tree improvement. Loblolly pine: the ecology and culture of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Edited by: Schultz RI. New Orleans. 1997, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 1-50.

  2. 2.

    Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Martin TA, Clark III A, Peter GF: Water availability and genetic effects on wood properties of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2010, 40: 2265-2277. 10.1139/X10-162.

  3. 3.

    Stojičić D, Budimir S, Ćulafić L: Micropropagation of Pinus heldreichii. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 1999, 59: 147-150. 10.1023/A:1006373218772.

  4. 4.

    Alcantara GB, Ribas LLF, Higa AR, Ribas KCZ, Koehler HS: Efeito da idade da muda e da estação do ano no enraizamento de miniestacas de Pinus taeda L. Revista Árvore. 2007, 31: 399-404.

  5. 5.

    Andrejow GMP, Higa AR: Potencial de enraizamento de miniestacas de Pinus taeda L. provenientes de brotação apical de mudas jovens. Floresta. 2009, 39: 897-903.

  6. 6.

    Faleiros M: Plantação a partir de clones de pínus já é feita no Brazil. 2011, Available in http://www.revistaopapel.org.br/noticia-anexos/1272649863_aee1535dc2037f6433ca5e0011dcd609_138912915.pdf

  7. 7.

    Gupta PK, Durzan DJ: Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry Trees III. Edited by: Bajaj YPS. 1991, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 16: 383-407.

  8. 8.

    Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum. 1962, 15: 473-497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.

  9. 9.

    Gupta PK, Durzan DJ: Shoot multiplication from mature trees of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana). Plant Cell Reports. 1985, 4: 177-179. 10.1007/BF00269282.

  10. 10.

    Coke JE: Basal nutrient medium for in vitro cultures of loblolly pines. USA Patent 5.534.434. 1996, Available in http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5534434.pdf accessed in May 16 2011

  11. 11.

    Coke JE: Basal nutrient medium for in vitro cultures of loblolly pines. USA Patent 5.534.434. 1996, Available in http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5534433.pdf accessed in May 16 2011,

  12. 12.

    Mehra-Palta A, Smeltzer RH, Mott RL: Hormonal control of induced organogenesis experiments with excised plant parts of loblolly pine. Tappi Journal. 1978, 61: 37-40.

  13. 13.

    Chang S, Sen S, McKinley CR, Aimers-Halliday J, Newton RJ: Clonal propagation of Virginia Pine (Pinus virginiana Mill.) by organogenesis. Plant Cell Reports. 1991, 10: 131-134.

  14. 14.

    Leach GN: Growth in soil of plantlets produced by tissue culture. Tappi Journal. 1979, 62: 59-61.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The autors are grateful to Battistella Florestal Company for the financial assistance, to FINEP (Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos), to REUNI (Reestruturação e Expansão das Universidades Federais) and the Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.

Author information

Correspondence to Leandro Francisdo de Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Keywords

  • Genetic Gain
  • Axillary Shoot
  • Nodal Segment
  • Pinus Taeda
  • Apical Shoot