Skip to main content
  • Oral presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Biotechnology strategies with industrial fuel ethanol Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for efficient 1st and 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugarcane

Background

In Brazil the production of fuel ethanol is based on the fermentation of sucrose from sugarcane by selected industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains [13], a mature and highly competitive technology. Taking into account that the feedstock costs have a major role in the overall economics of the process, it is expected that more efficient conversions of sucrose into ethanol (1st generation bioethanol) will be of high economical significance. Another promising strategy to improve bioethanol production is the fermentation of the lignocellulosic material present in sugarcane bagasse and leaves (2nd generation bioethanol), a biomass containing large amounts of xylose, a sugar not fermented by S. cerevisiae yeast strains [4]. Thus, although the integration of 1st and 2nd generation ethanol production in the Brazilian industry is considered the best option for bioethanol production [5], there are still several drawbacks to fully develop an efficient industrial production system. In this presentation we will show the metabolic and genomic engineering strategies that we are introducing into industrial yeast strains to improve bioethanol production in Brazil.

Results and conclusion

We have recently show that it is possible to improve sucrose fermentation through genomic and evolutionary engineering strategies that switch the way yeast cells ferment this disaccharide: the active transport and intracellular sucrose hydrolysis allows an increase of 11% in the ethanol yield [6]. We are introducing these modifications into the genome of diploid industrial fuel ethanol yeasts that dominate fermentation processes in Brazil [1, 2], showing excellent results. In order to improve the 2nd generation bioethanol production, we have initially screen a panel of several Brazilian industrial S. cerevisiae strains for their ability to ferment xylulose (an intermediate in xylose catabolism), and the best xylulose fermenting yeasts were engineered by chromosomal integration of the xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase genes (both from Scheffersomyces stipitis), and also the xylulokinase gene from S. cerevisiae, under control of strong constitutive promoters. Our results show that the recombinant yeast strains can ferment xylose efficiently, especially under glucose-xylose and sucrose-xylose co-fermentations, highlighting the importance of modifying industrial yeast strains for efficient 1st and 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugarcane.

In an attempt to further improve the industrial recombinant yeast strains, new yeast species isolated from rotten wood in Brazil [79] have been also evaluated for the fermentation of xylose and cellobiose (a disaccharide present in cellulose hydrolysates). Cellobiose inhibits the cellulases required for cellulose hydrolysis, and the β-glucosidases used to hydrolyze this disaccharide constitute the highest cost in the enzymatic blend. Our results show that some Spathaspora yeast strains are efficient cellobiose fermenters due to active transport of the sugar and intracellular hydrolysis of disaccharide, which has a great potential for lignocellulose fermentation since there will not be glucose present in the hydrolysates to compete with xylose transport by the yeast hexose transporters [4, 10]. Some Spathaspora yeasts are also efficient xylose fermenting strains due to xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase enzymes with paired co-factor preferences, as well as high-capacity active H+-xylose symporters. We have sequenced the genome of the type strain of the xylose-fermenting S. arborariae yeast [7], and identify several candidate genes encoding for the enzymes involved in xylose catabolism, as well as genes for sugar transporters. These genes have been already cloned into overexpression plasmids for introduction into S. cerevisiae yeasts to further optimize bioethanol production from sugarcane in Brazil.

References

  1. Basso LC, de Amorim HV, de Oliveira AJ, Lopes ML: Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8: 1155-1163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stambuk BU, Dunn B, Alves SL, Duval EH, Sherlock G: Industrial fuel ethanol yeasts contain adaptive copy number changes in genes involved in vitamin B1 and B6 biosynthesis. Genome Res. 2009, 19: 2271-2278.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Babrzadeh F, Jalili R, Wang C, Shokralla S, Pierce S, Robinson-Mosher A, Nyren P, Shafer RW, Basso LC, de Amorim HV, de Oliveira AJ, Davis RW, Ronaghi M, Gharizadeh B, Stambuk BU: Whole-genome sequencing of the efficient industrial fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CAT-1. Mol Genet Genomics. 2012, 287: 485-494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stambuk BU, Eleutherio ECA, Florez-Pardo LM, Souto-Maior AM, Bon EPS: Brazilian potential for biomass ethanol: challenge of using hexose and pentose co-fermenting yeast strains. J Sci Ind Res. 2008, 67: 918-926.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Macrelli S, Mogensen J, Zacchi G: Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugar-based ethanol process. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2012, 5: 22-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basso TO, de Kok S, Dario M, do Espirito-Santo JC, Müller G, Schlölg PS, Silva CP, Tonso A, Daran JM, Gombert AK, van Maris AJ, Pronk JT, Stambuk BU: Engineering topology and kinetics of sucrose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved ethanol yield. Metab Eng. 2011, 13: 694-703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cadete RM, Santos RO, Melo MA, Mouro A, Gonçalves DL, Stambuk BU, Gomes FCO, Lachance MA, Rosa CA: Spathaspora arborariae sp. nov., a D-xylose-fermenting yeast species isolated from rotting wood in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009, 9: 1338-1342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Santos R, Cadete RM, Badotti F, Mouro A, Wallheim DO, Gomes FCO, Stambuk BU, Lachance MC, Rosa CA: Candida queiroziae sp. nov., a cellobiose-fermenting yeast species isolated from rotting wood in Atlantic Rain Forest. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2011, 99: 635-642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cadete RM, Melo MA, Zilli JE, Vital MJ, Mouro A, Prompt AH, Gomes FC, Stambuk BU, Lachance MA, Rosa CA: Spathaspora brasiliensis sp. nov., Spathaspora suhii sp. nov., Spathaspora roraimanensis sp. nov. and Spathaspora xylofermentans sp. nov., four novel (D)-xylose-fermenting yeast species from Brazilian Amazonian Forest. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2013, 103: 421-431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Subtil T, Boles E: Competition between pentoses and glucose during uptake and catabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012, 5: 14-

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work at LBMBL is funded by the Brazilian agencies CAPES, CNPq, FAPESC and FINEP, and by the Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stambuk, B.U. Biotechnology strategies with industrial fuel ethanol Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for efficient 1st and 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugarcane. BMC Proc 8 (Suppl 4), O36 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S4-O36

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S4-O36

Keywords