Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Proceedings

Open Access

Synthesis, purification, characterization, and antinociceptive activity of opioids peptides

  • Mariana Nóbrega1,
  • Felipe Vinecky1,
  • Karla Moreira2,
  • Marcia Mortari2 and
  • Carlos Bloch3
BMC Proceedings20148(Suppl 4):P184

https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S4-P184

Published: 1 October 2014

Keywords

Synthetic peptidesopioids and in vivo tests

Background

Bioactive peptides prospection is important for biotechnology field as well as a starting point in many research areas, such as: new drugs development and production of genetically modified plants [1]. In general, bioactive peptides have been identified as candidates for the new drugs development because their intrinsic properties concerning some potential activities, like high specificity, potency, less toxicity, and also chemistry and biological diversity [2]. Peptides can present diverse activities such as antimicrobial, opioids, hypotensive, antithrombotic among others. In 2010, around 60 synthetic peptides with therapeutic potential have been available to pharmaceutical marketing and can be used in many pathologies like, allergies, asthma, arthritis, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, gastrointestinal dysfunction, growth problems, inflammation, obesity, infectious diseases, cancer, osteoporosis, pain, vaccines and others. [3, 4]. For pharmaceutical industry, in therapeutic area, the most promising projects are those that focus on cancer, pain, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and depression [5]. This study aims to design sequences of synthetic peptides that may have dual activity: antinociceptive and hypotensive. These peptides act on different targets, opioids receptors and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), respectively.

Methods

Peptides primary structure prediction was based on previous work of our group, which focused on prospection and bioactive peptides characterization. These studies were based on the knowledge available on the literature about the biological properties of specific protein domains, molecular targets and drug actions. The peptides were synthesized by solid-phase chemical synthesis using Fmoc strategy followed by purification on high performance liquid chromatography. Purity and confirmation of the primary structure were determined by mass spectrometry, MALDI and ESI. The peptides were tested in mice (6-8 per group) intraperitoneally, equimolar to morphine (positive control) in order to assess its possible antinociceptive activity through hot plate and tail flick assays.

Results and conclusions

It was possible to evaluate the antinociceptive activity of these two designed peptides, which present unpublished sequences. Both exhibited pharmacological activity in vivo, which may be denominated opioid receptor agonists, because they promoted antinociception in mice when exposed to thermal stimulation. In naloxone presence, there was no activity, so it can be concluded that the peptides interact with opioid receptors. In vivo tests showed that synthetic peptides have delayed response, longer activity compared to morphine and may have cross the blood-brain barrier. Thus, it is interesting continue studying therapeutic potential of these peptides to contribute with development for new drug candidates.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Molecular, Universidade de Brasília
(2)
Laboratório de toxinologia, departamento de fisiologia, instituto de biologia, Universidade de Brasília
(3)
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia

References

  1. Brand GD, Magalhães MTQ, Tinoco MLP, Aragão FJL, Nicolis J, Kelly SM, Cooper A, Bloch CB: Probing protein sequences as sources for encrypted antimicrobial peptides. Plos one. 2012, 7: 1-14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045848Google Scholar
  2. Mason JM: Design and development of peptides and peptide mimetics as antagonists for therapeutic intervention. Future Med Chem. 2010, 2: 1813-1822. 10.4155/fmc.10.259. doi: 10.4155/fmc.10.259View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lisowski V, Martinez J, Khrestchatisky M: Synthetic therapeutic peptides: science and market. Drug discovery today. 2010, 15 (1-2): 40-56. 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.10.009. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.10.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stevenson CL: Advances in peptide pharmaceuticals. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2009, 10 (1): 122-137. 10.2174/138920109787048634. doi: 10.2174/138920109787048634View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrowsmith JA: Decade of change. Nature, drug discovey. 2012, 11: 17-18. 10.1038/nrd3630. doi:10.1038/nrd3630View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nóbrega et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement