Skip to main content
  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Evaluation of antibacterial and toxicity activity in vitro of extracts from Tournefortia bicolor S.W (Boraginaceae)

Background

The reported use of medicinal plants has shown that they are part of human evolution and were the first therapeutic resources used by people. The search for new alternatives to replace or serve as an adjunct to antimicrobial treatment available has been prioritized. Brazil has a great biodiversity of plants, which are popularly used for medicinal form. Vegetables have been widely used in health care due to its medicinal properties, such as antibacterial, antifungal and immunomodulatory activities [1], but can be evaluated for their antitumor potential, insecticide, pesticide, or even cercaricide among other biological actions that depend on cytotoxicity [2, 3]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of the extract, fractions and subfractions of a native plant to the state of Alagoas, the Tournefortia bicolor.

Methods

Experimental in vitro study, conducted at the Research Laboratory of Wound Care, at Federal University of Alagoas. Three samples were tested at T. bicolor (Sheet Part - Neutral hexane; Stem Part - Acetate fraction; Stem Part - Chloroform fraction and methanol fraction). The samples were subjected to bioassays in Petri dishes by the disk diffusion method to evaluate the potential for bacterial growth inhibition by halo formation facing the strains of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 31488, Shigella flexneri ATCC 12022, Enteroccocus faecalis ATCC 29212, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Escherichia coli ATCC 14942, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 12344, distributed by the American Type Cell Collection. All extracts were tested against Brine Shrimps.

Results and conclusions

All samples suggested inactive against the strains tested, due to non-appearance of inhibition zone. Thus, due to inactivity of the samples in the disk diffusion test front of the strains bacterial tested, did not occur to testing of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). The cytotoxicity avaliation of the samples was performed using the lethality assay against Brine Shrimps. The extracts evaluated, two had - if nontoxic. In toxicity tests with brine, only the hexane extract neutral - and leaf ethyl acetate - stems were presented nontoxic, with a mortality rate of 0% and 10%, respectively. The chloroform methanol extract - stem proved toxic with a mortality rate of 73.34%. All extracts were thymol as a positive control, which has the ability to break the cytoplasmic membrane and therefore carry the larvae of Brine Shrimps to death by dehydration [4], with 100% mortality in the brine. However extracts and pure compounds from plant species that have CL50<500 mg/mL are considered toxic, but can be evaluated for their antitumor potential, insecticide, pesticide, or even cercaricide to combat the infectious form of Schistosoma mansoni among other biological actions that depend on cytotoxicity [2, 3]. Studies conducted at the National Cancer Institute in the United States, Brine correlated to high toxicity, or CL50 low concentrations with significant growth inhibition in vitro of cell lines derived from solid tumors [5].

References

  1. Balbino CA, Pereira LM, Curi R: Mechanisms involved in wound healing: a review. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2005, 41 (1): 27-51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mclaughlin JL: Methods in Plant Biochemestry. Edited by: Dey PM, Harbone J. 1991, New York: Academic Press, 6: 1-32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Solis PN, Wright CW, Anderson MM, Gupta MP, Phillipson D: A microwell cytotoxicity using Artemia salina (Brine shrimp). Planta Med. 1992, 59: 250-252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis MD, Baxendale FP: Toxicity of seven monoterpenoids to tracheal mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) and their honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) hosts when applied as fumigants. J Economic Entomology. 1997, 90: 1087-1091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson JE, Goetz CM, Mclaughlin JL, Suffness M: A blind comparison of simple bench-top bioassays and human tumour cell cytotoxicities as antitumor prescreens. Phytochem Analysis. 1991, 2: 107-111. 10.1002/pca.2800020303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology, Federal University of Alagoas, Center for Information Technology (NIT-PROPEP), Research Laboratory of Wound Care, Laboratory of Biomaterials, University Tiradentes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mélo Silva, I.S.d., da Silva, A.L.L., dos Santos, R.F.E.P. et al. Evaluation of antibacterial and toxicity activity in vitro of extracts from Tournefortia bicolor S.W (Boraginaceae). BMC Proc 8 (Suppl 4), P31 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S4-P31

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S4-P31

Keywords