Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Meeting abstract
  • Open Access

Fixing fractures of the ulnar styloid in distal radius fractures

  • 1
BMC Proceedings20159 (Suppl 3) :A43

https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-9-S3-A43

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Distal Radius Fracture
  • Tenosynovitis
  • Acute Setting
  • Fracture Stabilization
  • Ulnar Styloid

The majority of distal radius fractures are associated with an ulnar styloid fracture [13]. There is solid evidence in the literature that this association may ultimately affect the clinical outcome causing instability, disability, and pain in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) [2, 47]. The main reasons for the worse outcome are: (1) DRUJ instability, (2) impingement with the triquetrum, and (3) Extensor Carpi Ulnaris (ECU) tenosynovitis.

Because of its close association with the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex (TFCC), fractures of the ulnar styloid might indicate possible TFCC disruption with subsequent DRUJ instability [4, 8, 9]. Studies on the clinical relevance of ulnar styloid fractures have produced conflicting results. However, when considering size and displacement of the fracture, May et al [2] found that, after distal radius fracture stabilization, a fracture through the base of the ulnar styloid that involves most part of the TFCC attachment and stays in a deviated more radial position (2 mm or more) indicates DRUJ instability. In an ulnar styloid fracture model, Shaw et al [4] found that K-wire fixation of the ulnar styloid fracture restored stability to the DRUJ regardless the integrity of other supporting structures.

Bone fragments resulting from non-union could also provoke irritation and pain [5, 10] due to impingement with the triquetrum [11]. Twenty-six percent of ulnar styloid fractures develop non-union [12]. From those, just a few becomes symptomatic [5]. If the DRUJ is stable, simple removal of the fragment usually solves the problem [5, 11]. Extensor carpi ulnaris tendon impingement caused by malalignment of a fibrous nonunion may also be responsible for a poor clinical outcome. [13, 14]. This condition is rarely found after a distal radius fracture and it is successfully treated with excision of the bony prominence and reconstruction of the floor of the sixth compartment. Hence, fixation of a small sized ulnar styloid in the acute setting of a distal radius fracture is probably unnecessary.

As the results of treatment of chronic instability of DRUJ following a distal radius fracture are more unpredictable [4], it is advisable to take all measures in the acute setting to prevent this complication. Therefore, fixation of the ulnar styloid is indicated when there are large sized fragments that persist deviated after stabilization of the radius or when the distal radioulnar joint is grossly unstable. Immobilization with a sugar tong splint for four weeks or until proper healing is necessary when the surgeon chooses not to fix a reduced ulnar styloid large fragment that is acceptably reduced.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital Povisa, Vigo, 36211, Spain

References

  1. Frykman G: Fracture of the distal radius including sequela: shoulder-hand-finger syndrome, disturbance in the distal radioulnar joint and impairment of nerve function. Acta Orthop Scand. 1967, 108 (suppl): 1-153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. May MM, Lawton JN, Blazar PE: Ulnar styloid fractures associated with distal radius fractures: incidence and implications for distal radioulnar joint instability. J Hand Surg Am. 2002, 27 (6): 965-971. 10.1053/jhsu.2002.36525.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Villar RN, Marsh D, Rushton N, Greatorex RA: Three years after Colles’ fracture. A prospective review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987, 69 (4): 635-638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shaw JA, Bruno A, Paul EM: Ulnar styloid fixation in the treatment of posttraumatic instability of the radioulnar joint: a biomechanical study with clinical correlation. J Hand Surg Am. 1990, 15 (5): 712-720. 10.1016/0363-5023(90)90142-E.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hauck RM, Skahen J, Palmer AK: Classification and treatment of ulnar styloid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am. 1996, 21 (3): 418-422. 10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80355-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Orhun H, Dursun M, Gürkan V, Sario E, Altun G, Akça O: A new index for the assessment of distal radius fractures involving the ulnar styloid. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011, 45 (4): 261-265.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Krämer S, Meyer H, O’Loughlin PF, Vaske B, Krettek C: The incidence of ulnocarpal complaints after distal radial fracture in relation to the fracture of the ulnar styloid. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013, 38 (7): 710-717. 10.1177/1753193412469582.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Af Ekenstam F, Jakobsson OP, Wadin K: Repair of the triangular ligament in Colles’ fracture: no effect in a prospective randomized study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989, 60 (4): 393-396. 10.3109/17453678909149304.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindau T, Arner M, Hagberg L: Intraarticular lesions in distal fractures of the radius in young adults. J Hand Surg. 1997, 22 (5): 638-643. 10.1016/S0266-7681(97)80364-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgess RC, Watson HK: Hypertrophic ulnar styloid nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988, 215-217. 228Google Scholar
  11. Protopsaltis and Ruch. 2010Google Scholar
  12. Bacorn RW, Kurtzke JE: Colles' fracture: a study of two thousand cases from the New York State Workmen's Compensation Board. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1953, 35-A (3): 643-658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Crimmins CA, Jones NF: Stenosing tenosynovitis of the extensor carpi ulnaris. Ann Plast Surg. 1995, 35 (1): 105-107. 10.1097/00000637-199507000-00020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kiyono Y, Nakatsuchi Y, Saitoh S: Ulnar–styloid nonunion and partial rupture of extensor carpi ulnaris tendon: two case reports and review of the literature. J Orthop Trauma. 2002, 16 (9): 674-677. 10.1097/00005131-200210000-00011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fernandez; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement