Volume 9 Supplement 4
The 'Zero Tolerance Village Alliance': A promising intervention for addressing sexual and gender-based violence in rural communities
© Nicholson and Carty; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015
Published: 7 July 2015
Worldwide, few countries have higher rates of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) than South Africa . From 2013 to 2014 alone, nearly 50,000 rape incidents were reported to the police in the country . This predicament affects the young and the old: the majority of sexual violence survivors presenting at Thuthuzela Care Centers are less than 18 years of age (60%), and 40% of all rape survivors are pre-teens under the age of 12 . Nonetheless, annual reporting rates of rape in the country are comparatively low, with only 1 in 9 rapes reported each year . Furthermore, the issue of sexual violence in South Africa is compounded by the linkages between such violence and HIV seropositivity . Given these realities, this study sought to assess the effects of an intervention geared toward positively influencing negative community norms related to SGBV.
Materials and methods
The study used a pre- and post-intervention design with a comparison group, covering villages in the Thohoyandou region of Limpopo Province in South Africa. Two villages (Lunungwi and Tshiombo) served as the intervention sites, while one village (Mangondi) served as the comparison site.
The intervention was implemented by the Thohoyandou Victim Empowerment Programme in rural South Africa over a 9-month period from May 2011 to January 2012. Referred to as the 'Zero Tolerance Village Alliance' (ZTVA), the intervention was premised on the notion that changing SGBV norms would require the involvement of all community members (particularly men and women), and that, ultimately, a village would have to take ownership of the issue of SGBV, understand the need to ensure a 'zero-tolerance' environment against SGBV, and demonstrate motivation to have their community branded in this way. Addressing these issues would be likely to reduce levels of SGBV in communities, lessen stigma around admitting personal experiences of SGBV, and increase awareness of where to obtain care for SGBV. Being branded as a 'zero-tolerance' village might also help ensure the sustainability of any gains made as a result of the intervention.
The ZTVA model comprised several different components geared toward mobilizing communities to come together in a united effort against SGBV. These components included:
a series of community dialogues to introduce and promote ownership of the ZTVA model
the appointment of a Stakeholders Forum representative of community structures and agencies (e.g., traditional authority, churches, schools, businesses, and civil society agencies), and responsible for facilitating and monitoring intervention activities
the development of a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) outlining the criteria for a village's induction into the Zero Tolerance Village Alliance
the development of community maps to highlight opportunities for partnerships to enhance SGBV service provision, and to disseminate SGBV messages
training of Stakeholder Forum members on SGBV good governance procedures and policies, rights and responsibilities, and accountability monitoring (this training includes a 'Training of Trainers' module to ensure cascading of training to other community groups)
promoting the attainment of ZTVA criteria, including (but not limited to):
participation of at least 1,250 adults and youth per village in a series of five workshops or dialogues, covering SGBV issues and accountability monitoring
adherence of government service providers to their relevant and respective mandates (e.g., police trained in victim empowerment, clinics displaying Victim's Charter and providing male and female condoms)
existence of: a short-term, community-run safe house for victims of domestic violence; and a functioning support group for people living with HIV and orphans and vulnerable children
Once the village concerned meets all the induction criteria listed above, the final aspect of the intervention involves a public ceremony during which men of the village are invited to make a public pledge to proactively address the eradication of SGBV in their village. Pledgers are asked to sign a 'Roll of Honor,' and given a 'Badge of Honor' to identify them as men who have taken a zero-tolerance stance. Women are given a 'Badge of Courage' to promote their agency to report abuse. The ceremony culminates in the unveiling of a large billboard in the inducted village, declaring its zero-tolerance status.
Data collection and analysis
Household survey data were collected from women and men via structured questionnaires before and after the intervention in all study sites. Descriptive statistics on each variable at baseline and endline constituted the principal procedure for data analysis, in addition to comparison of baseline and endline information from intervention and comparison villages. The data were analyzed using the Minitab Release 14.20 statistical software package.
A total of 1,134 and 1,180 women and men participated in the baseline and endline household surveys, respectively, from all 3 villages combined. Selected results presented in this paper center on self-reported experiences of SGBV, knowledge of where to access post-rape care services, and gender beliefs about sexual refusal in intimate partnerships.
Self-reported experiences of SGBV
Knowledge of where to access post-rape care
By endline, there was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of female and male respondents in Lunungwi (one of the ZTVA intervention villages) who strongly agreed with the notion that women had the agency to refuse to have sex with their partner. Slight increases in this regard were also observed in Tshiombo (the second ZTVA village), but these were not statistically significant.
In contrast, the comparison village (Mangondi) saw a reduction in the proportion of men who believed a woman has the power to decline sexual advances from her partner. There were also reductions in the comparison village in the proportion of women and men alike who agreed (as opposed to 'strongly agreed') with this statement. None of the changes observed in the comparison village were statistically significant.
Financial support for this study was provided by the Swedish-Norwegian Regional HIV and AIDS Team for Africa, Embassy of Sweden, Lusaka.
- United States Government: United States Government gender-based violence assessment report, South Africa. 2011, Johannesburg, South Africa: United States GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- Institute for Security Studies, Africa Check: Factsheet: South Africa's official crime statistics for 2013/14. 2014, Johannesburg, South Africa: Africa CheckGoogle Scholar
- Mathews S, Benvenuti P: Violence against children in South Africa: Developing a prevention agenda. South African Child Gauge. 2014, 26-34.Google Scholar
- Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, MacIntyre JA, Harlow SD: Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. The Lancet. 2004, 363 (9419): 1415-1421. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16098-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Undie CC, Van Lith LM, Wahome M, Obare F, Oloo E, Curtis C: Community mobilization and service strengthening to increase awareness and use of postabortion care and family planning in Kenya. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2014, 126 (1): 8-13. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.12.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.