Expression of trypanotolerance in N’Dama x Boran crosses under field challenge in relation to N’Dama genome content
© Orenge et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Published: 3 June 2011
Animal trypanosomosis in sub-Saharan Africa is a major obstacle to livestock based agriculture. Control relies on drugs with increasing incidence of multiple-drug resistance. A previous mapping experiment in an F2 population derived from the indigenous trypanotolerant N’Dama cattle crossed to susceptible (Kenya)-Boran cattle under controlled challenge, uncovered a number of trypanotolerance QTL (T-QTL). The present study was to determine expression of N’Dama trypanotolerance in a backcross to the Boran under conditions of field challenge, and whether chromosomal regions associated with trypanotolerance in the F2 experiment showed similar effects in the BC population.
192 backcross animals to the Boran were produced in six batches from June 2001 to December 2006. At one year of age animals were moved to the field and exposed to natural challenge over about one year in Southwest Kenya (Narok). The animals were individually recorded weekly for body weight, packed cell volume, parasitaemia score, and drug treatments, and were genotyped using 35 microsatellite markers spanning 5 chromosomes found in the F2 study to harbour T-QTL.
The F1 were most trypanotolerant, Boran least, and BC intermediate. Females showed distinctly higher trypanotolerance than males. There was a positive correlation in the BC population between trypanotolerance and number of N’Dama origin marker alleles. QTL mapping revealed T-QTL distributed among all five targeted chromosomes, corresponding in part to the results obtained in the F2 experiment.
N’Dama origin trypanotolerance is expressed in a BC population under field conditions in proportion to N’Dama origin marker alleles. Consequently, marker assisted selection in such populations may be a means of increasing trypanotolerance, while retaining the desirable productive qualities of the recurrent parent.
Animal trypanosomosis in sub-Saharan Africa is a major obstacle to livestock based agriculture [1, 2]. As a vaccine is not available and vector control measures are ineffective in the long term, control relies on drugs with increasing incidence of multiple-drug resistance . A number of indigenous cattle breeds, of which the West African N’Dama (B. taurus) is the most prominent, are trypanotolerant . However, the N’Dama, although eminently suitable for its present highly extensive agro-ecological niche, is a small animal not suitable for draught purposes, and with limited potential for more intensive meat or milk production. Identifying QTL responsible for trypanotolerance could provide a basis for effective marker-assisted introgression of trypanotolerance from the N’Dama to larger animals more suitable for draught purposes, and with potential for greater productivity under more intensive production conditions. A previous mapping experiment  in a N’Dama x Kenya Boran (susceptible B. indicus origin) F2 population under controlled challenge, uncovered a number of trypanotolerance QTL (T-QTL). The objective of the present study was to determine whether N’Dama trypanotolerance was expressed in a backcross to the Boran under conditions of field challenge, whether the chromosomal regions associated with trypanotolerance in the F2 experiment showed similar effects in the BC population, and whether trypanotolerance and body weight were closely associated in the BC.
192 (N’Dama x Kenya Boran) x Kenya Boran BC animals were produced in six batches from June 2001 to December 2006, using semen of F1 males produced in the previous F2 experiment, and reared in a tsetse fly free area. Some of the batches also included F1 (N’Dama x Kenya Boran) and purebred Kenya Boran animals as controls. At one year of age animals were moved to the field and exposed to natural field challenge by tsetse flies over the course of one year in Southwest Kenya (Narok). All animals were treated when PCV values were below 18% or the animals otherwise showed danger of mortality.
Acronyms (ACR) and definitions of some trypanotolerance traits
Total number of positive parasitemia detections over entire challenge period (L).
Sum of all parasitemic scores over the entire challenge period (L)
Total number of infection cycles (number of new infections following initial exposure, or treatment) (L)
Proportion of non-treated parasitemia detections (H)
No. of days from first exposure to tsetse challenge to first parasitemia detection (H)
No. of days from first parasitemia detection to first treatment for that infection (H)
Mean PCV of animal during the entire challenge period (H)
Body weight change from initial body weight to weight at first treatment (L)
Gender and genetic type effects
Trypanotolerance effects of gender, genetic type (F1, BC, purebred Kenya Boran) and number of N’Dama origin marker alleles
Table 2 also shows gender effects as deviation of female BC mean from male BC mean, as a proportion of the BC mean. F1 and Kenya-Boran effects are shown as deviation of their respective means from the BC mean, as a proportion of the BC mean. Also shown is the deviation of the mean of the 30% of BC animals with highest N’Dama allele score from the mean of the 30% of BC animals with the lowest N’Dama allele score as a proportion of the mean trait value of the two groups. Females showed distinctly higher trypanotolerance than males for all eight of the trypanotolerance traits. F1, BC and purebred Kenya-Boran could not be compared with respect to body weight change under infection (WT1T1), since body weight is a major trait difference between the N’Dama and Kenya-Boran, and the animals as yearlings were still in growth phase. Aside from this, F1 animals showed higher trypanotolerance than BC for all traits except NIT (proportion of non-treated parasitemia detections) and DT1 (number of days from first parasitemia detection to first treatment for that infection. Thus, although F1 animals had appreciably fewer parasitemia detections (STR), total parasitemia score (TPS) and infection cycles (NINF) than the BC animals, and took longer until first infection following exposure (DF1), once parasitemia was detected, they progressed more rapidly to treatment, but overall maintained PCV better across the entire challenge period. The purebred Kenya Boran animals had to be removed from the challenge situation well before the end of the test period, and hence could not be compared to the BC for number of parasitemia detections (STR) sum of parasitemia scores (TPS) or number of infection cycles (NINF). However, they were infected sooner (DF1) and progressed to treatment more rapidly (DT1) than the BC animals.
Marker associated effects
As shown in Table 2, the 30% of BC animals with the highest number of N’Dama origin alleles at the 35 monitored markers were more trypanotolerant for all eight trypanotolerance traits, than the 30% of BC animals with the lowest number of N’Dama origin alleles at these markers. This is a remarkable results considering that only markers on five of the 29 autosomal chromosomes were monitored. QTL mapping revealed T-QTL distributed among all five targeted chromosomes, corresponding in part to the results obtained in the F2 experiment.
Body weight and trypanotolerance
Body weight of the BC animals prior to challenge (148.7 kg) was only slightly less than purebred Boran (153.0 kg), indicating that the BC animals retained at least some of the superior production features of the Boran. Body weight was not correlated to total trypanotolerance score or with total number of N’Dama alleles at the monitored markers.
The results of this study show that trypanotolerance of N’Dama origin comes to expression in a BC population under field challenge, indicating that an appreciable component of the tolerance is co-dominant and general in nature. Trypanotolerance was in proportion to overall proportion of N’Dama genome, with F1, BC and purebred Kenya-Boran ranking in that order, and also in direct proportion to the number of N’Dama alleles at the monitored marker loci. The large effects associated with the total number of N’Dama marker alleles supports the F2 mapping results that led to the choice of these five chromosomes as having particular association with trypanotolerance. It was encouraging that body weight of the BC animals was only slightly less than that of the purebred Boran, and was not tightly associated with either total trypanotolerance score or total number of N’Dama origin marker alleles, indicating that trypanotolerance is not inimical to larger body size.
This demonstrates that trypanotolerance observed under highly controlled conditions is also effective under field challenge. Also, that trypanotolerance is positively associated with number of N’Dama origin alleles, is expressed in heterozygous state, and does not appear to be tightly correlated with body weight. This suggests that MAS or genome-wide selection for trypanotolerance and mass selection for body weight could be used to increase both trypanotolerance and body weight in appropriate crosses. BC populations to the more productive breed would be a useful starting point for such breeding programs.
This research was supported by USAID CDR TA-MOU grant 02-C22027, and by grants to ILRI by UK, Japan, EU, Ireland, Germany and France and the CGIAR.
This article has been published as part of BMC Proceedings Volume 5 Supplement 4, 2011: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Animal Genomics for Animal Health (AGAH 2010). The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5?issue=S4.
- Onyiah JA: African animal trypanosomosis: An overview of the current status in Nigeria. Tropical Veterinarian. 1997, 15: 111-116.Google Scholar
- Swallow BM: Impacts of trypanosomiasis on African agriculture. PAAT Technical and scientific series 2. 2000, FAO, Rome,, 52-Google Scholar
- Peregrine AS: Chemotherapy and delivery systems: haemoparasites. Veterinary Parasitology. 1994, 54: 223-248. 10.1016/0304-4017(94)90092-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murray M, Morrison WI, Murray PK, Clifford DJ, Trail JCM: Trypanotolerance: A review. World Animal Review, 37 (January- March). Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations. 1981, Rome, 36-47.Google Scholar
- Hanotte O, Ronin Y, Agaba M, Nilsson P, Gelhaus A, Horstmann R, Sugimoto Y, Kemp S, Gibson J, Korol A, Soller M, Teale A: Mapping of QTL controlling resistance to trypanosomosis in an experimental cross of trypanotolerant West African N’Dama cattle (Bostaurus) and trypanosusceptible East African Boran cattle (Bosindicus). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 7443-7448. 10.1073/pnas.1232392100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Korol A, Ronin YI, Itzcovich A, Peng J, Nevo E: Enhanced efficiency of QTL mapping analysis based on multivariate complexes of quantitative traits. Genetics. 2001, 157: 1789-1803.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.