Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Proceedings

Open Access

Development of an advanced cell therapy product indicated for the treatment of gonarthrosis

  • Joaquim Vives1Email author,
  • Margarita Blanco1,
  • Marta Caminal1,
  • Maria I Coca1,
  • Margarita Codinach1,
  • Ruth Coll1,
  • Manuel Doral1,
  • Mireia Lloret1,
  • Irene Oliver-Vila1,
  • Isabel Ortega1,
  • Laura Reales1,
  • Míriam Requena-Montero1,
  • Luciano Rodríguez1,
  • Sílvia Torrents1 and
  • Joan García1
BMC Proceedings20159(Suppl 9):O9

https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-9-S9-O9

Published: 14 December 2015

Background

Gonarthrosis is the most common cause of pain and disability in middle-aged and elderly people [1, 2]. The lack of long-lasting effective treatments for repairing degenerated articular cartilage has spurred research into novel cell-based therapies aiming at reducing pain, slowing the degeneration of cartilage and, ultimately, reverting the natural history of osteoarthritis (OA) [3]. Herein we report the development of a mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-based therapy, from conception up to completion of a Phase I/IIa prospective, open-label, single-dose, single-arm clinical trial.

Materials and methods

All animal care and experimental procedures adhered to the recommendations of local, national, and European laws and were approved by the appropriate Ethical Committees on Human and Animal Experimentation.

A GMP-compliant bioprocess was designed for the production of the investigational cell-based medicinal product. Characterisation of MSC adhered to the minimal criteria established by the International Society for Cellular Therapy [4].

For the clinical study (EUDRA-CT: 2009-016449-24; http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01227694), fifteen patients with grade II/ III OA (Kellgren&Lawrence score [5]) and chronic pain were treated intraarticularly with clinical grade MSC and were followed up to 12 months. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Additionally, therapeutic efficacy was measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for daily activity and on exertion [6], Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) [7], the SF-36 questionnaire [8], the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) and Lequesne functional indexes[9]. Cartilage integrity was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and T2 relaxation time mapping [10, 11].

Results and discussion

Along the development programme, Good Scientific Practice (GxP) quality standards were implemented gradually in our laboratory (Figure 1)[12].
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the product development package. eGFP=enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein; GCP=Good Clinical Practice; GLP=Good Laboratory Practice; GMP=Good Manufacturing practice; MSC=Mesenchymal Stromal Cell.

The preclinical package included a proof-of-principle study in a large animal model of chronic OA and three regulatory preclinical studies in murine animal models (Table 1 Figure 1). The intra-articular injection of autologous MSC was safe, as judged by the lack of local or systemic adverse effects and evidence of regeneration of articular cartilage and meniscus was found in specific macroscopic and histological parameters [13]. Three further regulatory preclinical studies were performed in murine animal models in order to 1) assess subchronic toxicology, 2) analyse the biodistribution of human MSC, and 3) investigate dose:response relationship. Our results highlighted the safety of MSC either administered intra-articularly (up to 6x105MSC/knee in rats) or intravenously (IV, 1.3x107 MSC/kg in mice) and the persistence of IV-infused MSC in liver, kidney and spleen, at 3 months post-administration. No tumours were detected in any of the animals during the observation period. IV transplanted hMSC were principally found in the liver, kidneys and spleen of immunocompromised mice. The lungs, in spite of receiving a considerable number of cells immediately after administration, did not appear to be a welcoming environment adequate for MSC survival, thus confirming other author's observations [14].
Table 1

Summary of the product development package for a MSC-based medicinal for the treatment of gonarthrosis.

GLP

GMP

GCP

Study description

Experimental system

Dose; Route of administration

   

Assessment of long-term effects of autologous MSC treatment in an ovine chronic model of OA [13]

Ovis aries

(Ripollesa breed, ♀); surgically-induced OA

11x106 oMSC; intraarticular

X

X

 

Biodistribution of hMSC in an immunodeficient mouse model

Mus musculus

(NRG, ♀ and ♂)

4x105 hMSC; tail-vein injection

 

X

 

Single-dose toxicology study of intraarticularly administered hMSC in athymic rats

Rattus norvegicus

(NIH nude, ♂)

Up to 6x105 hMSC; intraarticular

X

X

 

Dose-response study after intraarticular injection of hMSC in a rat model of OA

Rattus norvegicus

(NIH nude, ♂);

MIA-induced OA

Up to 8x104 hMSC; intraarticular

X

X

 

Analysis of protooncogen expression levels, hTERT activity, senescense, G-banding karyotype, and CGH arrays on clinical grade hMSC

In vitro assays

N/A

 

X

X

Adult Stem Cell Therapy for Repairing Articular Cartilage in Gonarthrosis (EUDRA-CT: 2009-016449-24; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01227694)

Human(♀ and ♂); grade II/III knee OA

40.9x106 hMSC; intraarticular

GxP compliance of non-clinical and clinical studies, and for the production of batches of MSC are also indicated. GCP=Good Clinical Practice; GLP=Good Laboratory Practice; GMP=Good Manufacturing practice; MIA=monoiodoacetate; MSC=Mesenchymal Stromal Cell; OA=osteoarthritis; N/A=Not Applicable; NIH=National Institutes of Health; NRG=NOD.Cg-Rag1tm1Mom Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ.

Previous data in large translational animal models [15], and investigations on the role of MSC in cartilage [16, 17] and bone [18] regeneration, provided further support with respect to the safety and regenerative qualities of MSC.

For the clinical testing in humans, the drug product consisted in 40.9x106 ± 0.4x106 viable MSC in 10.0 ± 0.3 mL of saline solution. The phenotypic characteristics of the human MSC used in the study were 99.7% ± 0.2% CD45-CD105+, 99.0% ± 0.6% CD31-CD73+, 99.9 ± 0.3% CD90 and 15.5% ± 14.8 HLA-DR+. The combination of differentiation assays, growth profiles, morphology assessment and cytometric phenotype confirmed the MSC nature of the cells used in our studies. MSC suspensions tested negative for bacteria, mycoplasma and endotoxin before infusion into humans. The analgesic effect of the intra-articular infusion of MSC was remarkable, with all patients showing some degree of improvement in daily life physical activity and on exertion at month 12. Indeed all WOMAC, Lequesne and VAS indexes decreased in a similar manner over time, the most significant changes being observed at 6 and 12 months after treatment. A significant improvement was observed at 12 months in the vitality scale and at 3 months in the global health scale. HAQ decreased significantly from 0.38 at the basal visit to 0.2 at 12 months (p<0.05), thus indicating a global improvement of the perceived health status.

With respect to cartilage integrity, T2 values decreased significantly over time in all patients. These results may be indicative of regeneration of the articular cartilage in all patients at 1-year post-treatment. The fact that no pathological values were observed at 12 months in prior healthy areas highlighted the preventive effect of MSC on further degeneration.

Conclusions

We successfully designed and executed a reproducible GMP-compliant bioprocess for the manufacture of cell-based therapeutics. The clinical procedure involved a minimally invasive intervention, which was feasible and safe, resulting in pain relief and preventing further degeneration of articular cartilage.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to F. Gòdia, J.J. Cairó, and L. Orozcoand his team for their support in this project. This work was supported by grants ''Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad'' (IPT-300000-2010-0017), ''Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación'' (PSE-010000-2007-4//PSE-010000-2008-4, BIO2008-01985), Spanish Cell Therapy Network(TerCel, RD12/0019/0015) and by the European Regional Development Fund, within the National Plan for Scientific Research, Development and Innovation 2008-2011.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Divisió de Teràpies Avançades/XCELIA

References

  1. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, et al: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990?2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2012, 380: 2197-2223.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, et al: Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012, 380: 2163-2196.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Huey DJ, Hu JC, Athanasiou KA: Unlike bone, cartilage regeneration remains elusive. Science. 2012, 338: 917-921.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop D, Horwitz E: Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement.Cytotherapy. 2006, 8: 315-317.Google Scholar
  5. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS: Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957, 16: 494-502.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Huskisson EC: Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974, 2: 1127-1131.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Esteve-Vives J, Batlle-Gualda E, Reig A: Spanish version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire: reliability, validity and transcultural equivalency. Grupo para la Adaptacion del HAQ a la Poblacion Espanola J Rheumatol. 1993, 20: 2116-2122.Google Scholar
  8. Kosinski M, Keller SD, Ware JE, Hatoum HT, Kong SX: The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity. Med Care. 1999, 37: MS23-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Faucher M, Poiraudeau S, Lefevre-Colau MM, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M: Assessment of the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a modified WOMAC index in knee osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2004, 71: 121-127.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Trattnig S, Mamisch TC, Welsch GH, Glaser C, Szomolanyi P, Gebetsroither S, Stastny O, Horger W, Millington S, Marlovits S: Quantitative T2 mapping of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation at 3 Tesla: an in vivo cross-sectional study. Invest Radiol. 2007, 42: 442-448.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Crema MD, Roemer FW, Marra MD, Burstein D, Gold GE, Eckstein F, Baum T, Mosher TJ, Carrino JA, Guermazi A: Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. Radiographics. 2011, 31: 37-61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Vives J, Oliver-Vila I, Pla A: Quality compliance in the shift from cell transplantation to cell therapy in non-pharma environments. Cytotherapy. 2015Google Scholar
  13. Caminal M, Fonseca C, Peris D, Moll X, Rabanal RM, Barrachina J, Codina D, Garcia F, Cairo JJ, Godia F, et al: Use of a chronic model of articular cartilage and meniscal injury for the assessment of long-term effects after autologous mesenchymal stromal cell treatment in sheep. N Biotechnol. 2014, 31: 492-498.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Vilalta M, Degano IR, Bago J, Gould D, Santos M, Garcia-Arranz M, Ayats R, Fuster C, Chernajovsky Y, Garcia-Olmo D, et al: Biodistribution, long-term survival, and safety of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells transplanted in nude mice by high sensitivity non-invasive bioluminescence imaging. Stem Cells Dev. 2008, 17: 993-1003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Fonseca C, Caminal M, Peris D, Barrachina J, Fabregas PJ, Garcia F, Cairo JJ, Godia F, Pla A, Vives J: An arthroscopic approach for the treatment of osteochondral focal defects with cell-free and cell-loaded PLGA scaffolds in sheep. Cytotechnology. 2014, 66: 345-354.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Caminal M, Moll X, Codina D, Rabanal RM, Morist A, Barrachina J, Garcia F, Pla A, Vives J: Transitory improvement of articular cartilage characteristics after implantation of polylactide:polyglycolic acid (PLGA) scaffolds seeded with autologous mesenchymal stromal cells in a sheep model of critical-sized chondral defect. Biotechnol Lett. 2014, 36: 2143-2153.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Caminal M, Peris D, Fonseca C, Barrachina J, Codina D, Rabanal RM, Moll X, Morist A, Garcia F, Cairo JJ, et al: Cartilage resurfacing potential of PLGA scaffolds loaded with autologous cells from cartilage, fat, and bone marrow in an ovine model of osteochondral focal defect. Cytotechnology. 2015Google Scholar
  18. Velez R, Hernandez-Fernandez A, Caminal M, Vives J, Soldado F, Fernandez A, Pla A, Aguirre M: Treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis with advanced cell therapy in sheep. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012, 132: 1611-1618.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Vives et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement